Search results

"Coronavirus", 93 results
List view Grid view
Figure of the Week: 50

Figure of the Week: 50

The Stanford Internet Observatory analysed RT’s English-language coronavirus-related content and found that US was the subject of approximately 50% of clearly ”negative content“.
What did not happen in 2020?

What did not happen in 2020?

No, Coronavirus did not come to planet earth through a meteorite. Read here an overview of the most extravagant disinformation stories of 2020.
Figure of the Week: 117 Million

Figure of the Week: 117 Million

Harmful misinformation on the coronavirus was shared over 1.7 million times on Facebook and viewed an estimated 117 million times. This is the conclusion of a recent study published by the Avaaz activist network.
Figure of the week: up to 16 times

Figure of the week: up to 16 times

On social media, coronavirus-related content published by RT and Sputnik in French, German and Spanish languages can achieve higher average engagement per article than reputable media outlets, a recent study by the Oxford Internet Institute found.
Throwing Darts to See What Sticks

Throwing Darts to See What Sticks

This week’s cases take us on a frenzied ride through topics that have been preoccupying the pro-Kremlin media over the last several weeks: coronavirus, protests, historical revisionism, MH17, Ukraine, NATO. Disinformation to suit every possible palate.
What Happened in 2020?

What Happened in 2020?

2020 has brought many challenges and with them - a large volume of disinformation. Here’s an overview of the main trends observed by EUvsDisinfo.
EEAS BESONDERE BERICHTE

EEAS BESONDERE BERICHTE

Note: The objective of this report is to provide a snapshot overview of the current trends and insights into disinformation activities related to COVID-19/Coronavirus. It does not provide a comprehensive or complete overview and focusses primarily on the external dimension, in line with the European External Action Service (eeas)…
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 10

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Your opinion matters!

    Data Protection Information *

      Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

      Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

      Data Protection Information *

      The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.