DISINFO: 2020 US Presidential election was the dirtiest in history
DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: 2020 US Presidential election was the dirtiest in history

SUMMARY

Perhaps the main conclusion to be drawn from the recent election is that what some regard as the “almighty” American democracy is, upon closer inspection, more reminiscent of African or Ukrainian democracy. This election has been the dirtiest and most egregious in history. It featured dead souls, fraud, the infamous carousels, and an absence of observers.

What is more, 300,000 ballots were lost in the mail. They simply vanished! Just imagine the significance of 300,000 missing ballots when the difference between the candidates’ vote tallies in some states is so small.

RESPONSE

The story is part of an emerging pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative seeking to delegitimise the conduct and results of the 2020 US Presidential election.

The segment's conclusion that the 2020 Presidential election was especially dirty is not supported by expert opinions issued so far. In its interim assessment on the conduct of the election, the OSCE finds that the contest was "competitive and well managed" (p. 1), noting that "evidence-deficient claims about election fraud" (ibid.) have been refuted by "election officials at all levels" (p. 3) and "national security agencies" (p. 11).

It is telling that the report uses Russian electoral lingo to describe the allegedly widespread violations committed in the course of the election. "Dead souls" (mertvye dushi) is the established Russian tactic of padding the pro-regime vote by "enfranchising" the already deceased citizens whose names have yet to be expunged from the electoral register (p. 288n12). Independent investigation concluded, it was most recently used at the 2018 Russian presidential election and the 2020 Russian constitutional referendum, but no concrete evidence exists that this practice is systematically used in the US. See for instance here and here for detailed debunking of these claims in relation to the 2020 US Presidential poll.

In its turn, "carousels" is a crude ballot-stuffing method which involves bussing voters from one polling station to another for repeat voting. By contrast, multiple voting, whether premeditated or not, has had an infinitesimal impact on the outcome of US elections. For instance, out of more than 136 million votes cast in the 2016 US election, just over 8,000 absentee ballots were rejected because the voter had also cast a ballot in person, which accounts for roughly 0.006% of the total.

The report falsely claims that international observers were absent from the 2020 US election. In reality, an OSCE delegation has monitored the course of the presidential campaign and voting day since 29 September, and is scheduled to depart between 8 and 12 November.

Lastly, the claim that 300,000 ballots went undelivered as part of the mail-in voting process is false. Although that is roughly the number of ballots with missing delivery scans, that does not mean they were lost in transit. According to the US Postal Service, "the lack of delivery scans were a result of ballots that were picked out of the mail stream to speed up their processing, and "[t]hese ballots were delivered in advance of election deadlines."

Embed

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Your opinion matters!

    Data Protection Information *

      Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

      Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

      Data Protection Information *

      The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.