Disinfo: Alexei Navalny case: German doctors are silenced

Summary

A curious discrepancy: in Russia, the case is being freely and openly discussed by all sorts of professionals who have a say on the matter – doctors, those who treated the patient, investigators, journalists, diplomats, and politicians. However, in the West only high ranking politicians do the talking, the doctors are silent.  The doctors at the Berlin clinic Charité seem to have been gagged because they did not say anything. 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Navalny's poisoning.

The Berlin clinic Charité, where Alexei Navalny is being treated, has issued several statements with the preliminary results of medical investigation.

After Alexei Navalny was admitted to the Charité clinic, its doctors confirmed, after a careful investigation, that the Russian politician was poisoned by a substance from the group of cholinesterase inhibitors:

"Clinical findings indicate poisoning with a substance from the group of cholinesterase inhibitors. The specific substance involved remains unknown, and a further series of comprehensive testing has been initiated. The effect of the poison – namely, the inhibition of cholinesterase in the body – was confirmed by multiple tests in independent laboratories."

Charité also issued several statements on his condition: that Navalny remains in a serious condition (September 2), that his condition improved (September 7), and that Navalny was removed from mechanical ventilation (September 14).

See more recent stories on Navalny's poisoning: that Navalny is an agent of the Russian special services, that he was not poisoned by Novichok and Russian special services are not involved, and that he is an anti-Russian project and was poisoned by the sponsors.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 211
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 13/09/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, Germany
  • Keywords: novichok, Alexei Navalny

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

2008 August War is an example of how NATO poses threat to peace with its military excercises

Regular practices of conducting large-scale military exercises, such as Noble Partner 2020, in alliance with the Western states may pose a serious threat to peace and stability in the South Caucasus, the example of which was Georgia’s military aggression in August 2008. 

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on stability, NATO and the conflict between Russia and Georgia. 

The disinformation message aims to present the conflict in 2008 as "Georgian aggression" and deny Russia's role in it. In fact, according to the EU, Russian military presence in both Abkhazia and South Ossetia continues in violation of international law and commitments undertaken by Russia under the 12 August 2008 agreement.

The US is working on a biological weapon in Georgia

The US is working on a biological weapon in Georgia. Any leakage of such biomaterial can lead to outbreaks of serious diseases. Therefore, Americans are transferring laboratories in other countries. 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Lugar lab.

Consistent to the wide-spread pro-Kremlin conspiracy theory alleging that the United States develops biological weapons around the world,  including in ArmeniaGeorgiaUkraine and other countries. Read the latest here

The West uses Navalny case to stop the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and to hurt Putin

The West uses the case of Navalny to stop the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and to hurt Putin.

The assertions that the Russian state or even President Vladimir Putin himself was behind Navalny’s poisoning were rather shaky.

Of course, the Nord Stream 2 pipeline is also political, just as it was in the days of Willy Brandt’s Eastern Policy. At that time, the gas projects with Moscow had given the Federal Republic the chance to come to an understanding with a very difficult opponent like the Soviet Union on this issue. Nord Stream 2 was “Putin’s favourite child. That is why so many now want to stop the pipeline in order to hurt Putin.”

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Alexei Navalny poisoning.

There are no grounds for connecting the cause of Navalny's poisoning with the construction of Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.