Disinfo: Belarus is attacked from three sides, the situation is similar to June 1941 events


A global centre is expedient and politicises all spheres, including sport. It interferes in domestic affairs of any country under any pretext it wishes so. Belarus is under attack from the north, south, and the west. To host the Ice Hockey World Championship in such conditions would be analogous to organising a sporting event in Minsk in late June 1941 when the tanks are quickly proceeding towards the capital city. Russia was repeatedly attacked through sporting events, so it understands the situation around the removal of Belarus’s co-hosting rights very well.


This publication promotes the recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about alleged Western aggressiveness towards Belarus and Russia. It uses the classic accusation of Nazism/ Fascism through the absurd parallel between the current situation in and around Belarus and the Nazi Germany military occupation of the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic. See our past analysis Nazi east, Nazi west, Nazi over the cuckoo's nest explaining this classic technique of pro-Kremlin outlets.

Neither Ukraine nor EU countries threaten Belarus. They did not recognise the results of fraudulent presidential elections of 2020 and support the democratic inspirations of the Belarusian people. According to statistical data and independent observers, the official result of the presidential election was heavily doctored. A joint monitoring effort by three NGOs demonstrates the scale of falsification based on election protocols from 1,310 polling stations across Belarus and concludes that the announced result (80% of votes cast for Lukashenka) is mathematically "impossible" (p. 7).

On 18 January 2021, the IIHF Council announced the decision to move the 2021 IIHF Ice Hockey World Championship from Belarus, citing safety and security issues. It says, among other things, that the "IIHF Council has determined that it is currently impossible to ensure the welfare of teams, spectators and officials while holding a World Championship in Belarus". It is reported that under "safety and security issues" the ongoing political unrest and concerns over COVID-19 are meant. Some of the largest ice hockey championship sponsors, including Czech carmaker Skoda, German motor oil manufacturer Liqui Moly, and the Nivea Men skincare brand, had threatened to pull out of sponsoring the event if it took place in Belarus, citing widespread human rights abuses by the Belarusian authorities. In response to large-scale protests against the results of the fraudulent presidential election, by January 2021 over 30,000 people have been detained in Belarus, and almost 200 of them were declared political prisoners.

As for the Olympic doping ban on Russia, this was not a groundless West's attack against Russia as implied, but the ultimate decision of the international sporting bodies based on the scrupulous investigation. Please see earlier disinformation cases alleging that there is no evidence that Russian athletes used doping and that banning Russia from the Olympics is a modern form of racism.


  • Reported in: Issue 229
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 20/01/2021
  • Outlet language(s) Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Belarus, Russia
  • Keywords: WWII, Colour revolutions, Conspiracy theory, Nazi/Fascist
see more

Special forces detachment "Berkut" tried to protect Ukrainians 7 years ago

Seven years ago, armed clashes broke out in the centre of Kyiv when militant-nationalists from Western Ukraine were brought to Kyiv and the special forces, “Berkut”, tried to protect Ukrainians.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Euromaidan protests.

The Ukrainian revolution started from the gathering of students in Kyiv after former president Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the EU Association Agreement. They were not 'militant-nationalists' who were 'brought to Kyiv'. The memories of participants are well-documented and it shows that there were people from all over the country who participated by their own will. Far-right groups had a very limited presence during the protests.

Navalny is used as an instrument by the Western special services

Foreign states are behind all the actions of the opposition leader Alexei Navalny; there is no place for such people who “betrayed the country” in the Russian authorities.

Today, Navalny is used as an instrument (interference) by the Western special services, the State Department. Everyone should have an understanding that everything he does is backed by foreign states. Our task is to prevent foreign interference, whoever pursues policy here, the country must be protected.

And if a person has betrayed the country, if he is on foreign funding, there is nothing for him to do in any government bodies. You cannot help him engage in politics, represent our citizens in different government bodies.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Alexey Navalny.

Anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny has long been the most prominent face of Russian opposition to President Vladimir Putin. His candidacy in the 2018 presidential election was banned by authorities over his conviction by a Russian court of embezzlement, which bars him from running for office. He has been arrested and imprisoned several times during his political career.

Navalny's arrest could be used by the West to impose new anti-Russian sanctions

The arrest of opposition leader Alexey Navalny after his return to Moscow from Germany, where he was hospitalised after he fell ill in Omsk, Siberia, has provoked a new wave of reactions in the West against Russia. Many analysts believe that this is part of a strategy to impose new sanctions against Moscow.


A new twist of a previously used pro-Kremlin narrative that the poisoning of Alexei Navalny (and now his return to Russia) is a secret project to introduce sanctions on Russia.

Contrary to the claim, which is not backed by any evidence, Alexei Navalny is an independent Russian politician, not a pawn of any foreign government. His decision to return to Russia is related to his refusal to become an exile and to internal deliberations of his political movement, not to any order from abroad.