Disinfo: Belarus is under attack by the unilateral globalist world to indirectly destabilise Vladimir Putin

Summary

The CIA and the US state department have been financing small opposition groups in Belarus for years. They also mandate the French president to meddle in Belarus’s international affairs because the US doesn’t want to do it publicly. Belarus and Russia are two brother countries that were together for a millennium and have been artificially separated, because of the end of the Soviet Union. The aim of the globalist side is to attack Russia because it still resists them, but they do it indirectly, first they destabilise Belarus and neighbouring countries. Emmanuel Macron or the EU commission link the Navalny and Belarus files: it proves that this is a coordinated attack against Russia. The purpose is to take control of the Russian territory that resist their hegemony. There is a choice to make between the unilateral globalist world and the multilateral world advocated by Vladimir Putin. OSCE cannot help in Belarus because in 2004 they destroyed the political system of Ukraine. There cannot be new elections in Belarus, otherwise, it is the end of the legitimacy of the states. Leaders won’t be chosen by electors but appointed by the international community. This is the end of sovereignty and states.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about the all-Russian nation and Russian world, and Western attempts to disrupt Belarusian-Russian relations. Ukraine and Belarus are sovereign states. The disinformation message forwards a false dilemma about the direction of Belarus's and Ukraine's political development (union with Russia vs. an unavoidable loss of sovereignty degradation) and promotes the concept of all-Russian civilisation, an imperial Russian and Russian irredentist ideology that is a favoured pro-Kremlin narrative aimed at weakening the national identity of Belarusians and Ukrainians, as well as their sovereignty. Belarus and Ukraine are well-defined nation-states with a long history, which preserved their languages, literature and identity, despite foreign rule for long periods. The legitimacy of the state leaders come from fair elections and not the international community. The elections in Belarus cannot be called fair, even pro-Kremlin analysts admit massive frauds, hence the political crisis. For the lack of observance of democratic standards, the EU did not recognise the results of this election, and the subsequent repression against peaceful protesters led to the targeted sanctions. Read also Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians are one nation, The West wants to prepare Maidan in Belarus and the West’s attack against Belarus is also an attack against Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 214
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 29/09/2020
  • Outlet language(s) French
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: EU, France, US, Belarus, Ukraine, Russia
  • Keywords: Emmanuel Macron, Secret elites / global elites, Colour revolutions, Sovereignty, Vladimir Putin
see more

Russia never meddles in the internal affairs of other countries

Russia never meddles in internal affairs of its neighbours, or more generally any other country.

Disproof

Pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative denying the meddling in internal affairs of neighbouring countries and all countries in general.

The interference of Russia in internal affairs of ex-soviet countries is a long tradition that even ended sometimes in frozen armed conflicts.

The escalation between Armenia and Azerbaijan is directed against Russia

The escalation between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh is about to get out of control, a scenario wished by some. It can’t be ruled out that this may be directed against Moscow, where the goal is to take the war to a strategic territory for Russia, sensitive for the security of its southern flank. This is something that the Armenian government seem to be starting to understand, after having flirted with the US since 2018 without realising that for this power it is only and exclusively a tool for its regional strategy, subversive and terrorist since it is based on destroying and dividing countries, turning people into enemies of each other and this way securing its presence, the sale of weapons and the plundering of natural and material reaches. The future and welfare of Armenia depend on its indestructible alliance with Russia, something that is clear for most Armenians but not so much for some of its rulers who are now starting to understand that their political games jeopardise the mere existence of a country and a people.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory with no proof presented to support any of the claims, mixing several recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about Russia being encircled by an aggressive West, and the need for Russia’s neighbours to yield to its requests in order to maintain good relations. There is no evidence that foreign powers had anything to do with the September 2020 military escalation between Armenia and Azerbaijan and that the escalation is meant to destabilise Russia. See other examples in our database, such as claims that the US embassy in Armenia is a mini-Pentagon escalating tension in the region and the Middle East; that western curators organised an anti-Russian coup in Armenia; that the US is encircling Russia with biological labs for a future attack and is ready to carry out a false flag operation in Alaska to blame Russia; or that it is using the conflict of Nagorno-Karabakh to exhaust and destabilise Russia.

NYT story on Trump's tax returns proves Russiagate is a hoax

The New York Times report on Donald Trump’s tax returns admits that there are no financial ties between the US president and Russia. This proves that the Russiagate narrative is thoroughly discredited, and no one in their right mind is paying attention to CIA statements about “Russian influence” any longer.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative denying Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election. The NYT report analysing President Trump's tax returns does say that the documents do not "reveal any previously unreported connections to Russia" [emphasis added]. This does not contradict the January 2017 findings of the US intelligence community or the Special Counsel investigation. In the course of the latter, the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller "issued more than 2,800 subpoenas; [...] executed nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants; [...] obtained more than 230 orders for communications records; [...] and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses, including almost 80 before a grand jury" (Mueller report, p. 13), and concluded that Moscow had "interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion" (p. 1). See here for a summary of the report's findings.