Disinfo: Child protection service took at least one child from more than half of Norwegian families

Summary

Child Welfare Services in Norway have taken away at least one child from more than half of Norwegian families. In Norway, there is a very terrible, truly totalitarian system of alleged child protection called Barnevernet.

Disproof

Pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative concerning Western values.

In fact, according to official data, in 2019, the Norwegian Child Welfare Service placed in care 14,671 children, which is approximately 1% of all residents of the country between the ages of 0-22.

Also, according to the country's official statistics, in 2019 there were about 600,000 families who had at least one child. If the claim from the Russian media was true, the number of children placed in care would be in the hundreds of thousands.

At the same time, local experts note positive shifts in the field of child protection; every year the number of children placed in care in Norway decreases. For example, from 2013 to 2019, the number of such cases decreased by 39%.

The other claim about Barnevernet as a truly totalitarian system of child protection is false. It is a public agency responsible for child protection in Norway. It consists of services in each municipality, which are aided and supervised by different governmental bodies at the state as well as the county level. The main goal of the Bernevernet is to ensure that children and adolescents who are living under conditions that represent a risk to their health and/or development receive the help they need when they need it and to contribute to children and adolescents growing up in safe, secure and caring conditions.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 209
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/08/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Norway
  • Keywords: children, Western values, European values

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

West will falsely accuse Russia of poisoning Navalny, as with Skripal and Litvinenko

Whatever happens in the case of Navalny’s illness, the Russian authorities will be accused of poisoning him. After all, Russia has been accused of everything, including the poisoning of the Skripals who, by the way, are alive and well and no one has been brought to trial. I will also remind them of the Litvinenko case, which was not heard in a court of law. There was a forensic investigation, but the Brits refused to prosecute anyone and disregarded all information submitted by Lugovoy and Kovtun [Litvinenko’s alleged poisoners], despite the fact that Lugovoy proved his innocence via a lie detector test conducted by British specialists.

All these stories will now be retold, because Russia gets instantly blamed for everything that happens in the world.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives denying Russia's well-documented role in the poisonings of Sergey and Yuliya Skripal in 2018 and of Aleksandr Litvinenko in 2006, as well as casting Western governments and institutions as inherently Russophobic.

The UK authorities stated they had gathered sufficient evidence to levy criminal charges against the putative perpetrators of both poisonings. In May 2007, the UK's Crown Prosecution Service charged Andrey Lugovoy with "the murder of Mr Litvinenko by deliberate poisoning." Lugovoy has denied involvement in Litvinenko's death but refused to give testimony to a public inquiry over the crime. In any case, a formal request to extradite the suspect to the UK was denied by Moscow.

In Belarus citizens are not demonstrating against election falsification, rather professionals try to destabilise Lukashenko

There are some surprising things. For example, the Belarusian police arrested a man who behaved very violently and injured some police officers and who was found with $10,000 on him which he was distributing to demonstrators. But the question is, how many of them are really fed up with Lukashenko and how many of them are there because of a Maidan scenario?

Disproof

Classical disinformation narrative that opponents or demonstrators on former USSR territories are paid during colour revolutions organised by globalist forces to destabilise the legitimate authorities.

The site Komsomolskaya Pravda published a video of the man stating that the money was his own and he was not intending to distribute it or engage in politics. Open Media quoted by the Insider adds that the arrested man, Mikhail Simakov, is an individual entrepreneur engaged in the sale of used cars. On that day, he sold an Opel Zafira, returned home with the money, but he was detained at the entrance. Simakov's family stated that he has nothing to do with the protests and he did not hand money out to protestors as accused. 

Protester who died on the streets of Minsk was killed by a Molotov Cocktail he planned to throw

The first man who died during the protests, this so-called “peaceful demonstrator”, which all the Western media are full of, had a Molotov cocktail in his hand. This Molotov cocktail exploded in his hand. He failed to throw it at the police to blow them up.

People should understand that this isn’t a CNN scenario: the good guys demonstrating against the bad police forces because the state is bad. And states are bad when they have a policy that is not globalist. The main problem of the situation is that Lukashenka resists globalism.

Disproof

False information issued by the Belarus administration and propagated by Russian media to disqualify the civil protests in Belarus.

The video recording of the event and the testimony of his wife published by Associated Press contradict the police version. Stop Fake also examined the event from different videos taken from a different angle and it clearly appears that Alyaksandr Taraikousky, 34, had nothing in his hands and that there was no detonation near him when he was shot down by the police. His body doesn't show either the sequels of a deadly explosion.