Disinfo: CIA-influenced Facebook introduces the mechanism of preventive censorship of Sputnik


Today, the Internet market of Poland and the entire world is dominated by two corporations: Google and Facebook. The cooperation of these corporations with the CIA and other American state agencies responsible for Internet control is dangerous for freedom of speech in the Western World.

Information about the introduction of clear censorship against Sputnik or Press TV [by Facebook] puts the situation to a new level. Before, social media used to carry out repressive censorship. In other words, they intervened only after the information was presented to the public. Today, however, we face the mechanism of preventive censorship. The history shows that preventive censorship is introduced because of fear – it is a sign of the quick collapse of a dictatorship.


Pro-Kremlin conspiracy theory about social media (primarily, Facebook), advancing pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about “secret elites” and the West's alleged media censorship and societal control

This disinformation message is a reaction to recent policy changes by Facebook. On June 4, Facebook announced that it would label media outlets that are wholly or partially under the editorial control of their government. The labels are not censoring in any way but merely inform users about the publishers' origins to help them understand the source of the information they are consuming. This is designed to bring greater transparency about these publishers since they combine the influence of a media organisation with the strategic backing of a foreign state. The labels have been applied to Russia's Sputnik, as well as other state-controlled media outlets, like Iran’s Press TV and China’s Xinhua News.

See similar disinformation cases connected to Facebook - Google and Facebook manipulate information to destroy RussiaFacebook is a project of the Soros Foundation, financed by National Security AgencyFacebook is in the service of the US State Department.


  • Reported in: Issue 201
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 09/06/2020
  • Language/target audience: Polish
  • Country: Russia, US
  • Keywords: Google, social media, Facebook, Censorship, Freedom of speech, Secret services, Sputnik


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Russia’s effort to influence US elections is a conspiracy theory

The recent decision by Facebook to label as “state media” certain Russian, Chinese and Iranian outlets is an anachronistic propaganda tool which resembles Cold war tactics. Facebook labelled, among others, as state media Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik from Russia, Xinhua from China and Press TV from Iran. This move comes a few months before the next US presidential elections and some in the United States want to rejuvenate the conspiracy theory that Russia or some other foreign country meddled and influenced the results of the previous elections in 2016.


This is part of the pro-Kremlin's media's ongoing efforts to deny Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Facebook recently published a statement on the reasons for labeling state-controlled media that are wholly or partially under the editorial control of their government. This is not an "anachronistic propapanda tool" but a transparent, thorough exercise in which Facebook sought advice from experts in various fields. Indeed, Facebook has initiated an effort over the last few months to enhance its integrity profile ahead of the next US presidential elections in November 2020.

The US government demonises Russia and depicts President Putin as “the new Hitler”

Washington demonises Russia, conducts aggressive military maneuvers in Russia’s sphere of influence and rejects Russia’s president depicting him as “the new Hitler”.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming that the US and other Western states pursue  a belligerent and hostile agenda against Russia, that the US seeks to foment “colour revolutions” in post-Soviet nations and in Russia itself, that Russophobia dominates the West’s thinking about Russia, and that NATO is encircling Russia.

According to this narrative the West seeks to humiliate, weaken, disintegrate, conquer or subdue Russia, in order to portray Russia as the victim of unjustified aggression against which it must defend itself.

The West organises colour revolutions aimed at coup d’etat in Russia

The West is organising colour revolutions in former Soviet Republics aiming for a coup d’etat against Russia. A colour revolution in Russia is the strategic goal of the West which is dealing with “exporting revolutions” in former Soviet Republics. The US State Department and various NGOs are spending money and resources to achieve this objective.


Pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming that the United States supports the so-called "colour revolutions" around the world. This narrative portrays any spontaneous disorders or civil uprisings in any state and more particularly in the former Soviet republics, as "Western-funded colour revolutions".

Ukraine is the main case used by pro-Kremlin media to prove the existence of such a narrative, focusing on the Revolution of Dignity (Euromaidan) which took place in 2013. Moscow is also trying through Kremlin-funded media to substantiate a so-called "colour revolution" in Belarus against Russia. There have been earlier disinformation cases about the West trying to tear Belarus apart from Russia and apply a Ukraine-like scenario. It is quite possible that this recurrent theme in pro-Kremlin outlets' disinformation is connected with a more recent narrative that coronavirus could be used as a "colour revolution" technology.