Disinfo: Dalia Grybauskaite was a double agent


This is understandable now, it was clear to the Americans and in 1991. An ambitious unprincipled careerist, who also has an unprofitable compromising evidence, was a promising shot for them, so the Americans picked up Grybauskaite as a baton from the hands of the collapsed USSR and began to make her a career, as the KGB had done before.

If the assumption is true that it was the KGB who delegated the daughter of Polycarpas Gribauskas to Washington and sent for courses to Georgetown, this was done in order to make her “the double agent of deep laying” – an intermediary between the Soviets and the Americans, a liaison between the KGB and the CIA. Then the Soviet Union collapsed, the KGB was abolished and only the CIA remained.



Repeating recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the president of Lithuania. No evidence given to the claim that Dalia Grybauskaitė would have been working as a KGB agent. As explained by the Insider, the disinforming message started to circulate in 2015, when the website of the Center for Research of Genocide and Resistance of Lithuanian residents was hacked and fake documents about Grybauskaitė as an agent "Magnolia" were published. One of the documents was a letter that contains inaccuracies and formulations not used in the USSR in 1982, when it was allegedly written. euvsdisinfo.eu/report/president-of-lithuania-was-a-kgb-agent/,


  • Reported in: Issue 103
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 28/03/2018
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Lithuania
  • Keywords: Dalia Grybauskaitė
  • Outlet: rubaltic.ru


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Theresa May said that Sharia law is superior to British law

Sharia law is superior to British law. The British laws are not respected, and Theresa May, yesterday (March 21, 2018), said that many Brits are benefiting from Sharia law.


An article in Vlastenecké Noviny refers to a press conference held in May 2016. The very claim that the event happened yesterday (March 21, 2018) is a lie. In addition, the words of Theresa May are manipulated and extracted from the context. Theresa May literally said, "It will not be a review of the totality of Sharia law, which is a source of guidance for many Muslims in the UK. Many British people of different faiths follow religious codes and practices, and benefit from the guidance they offer. There is only one rule of law in our country, which provides rights and security for every citizen."

Foreign election monitors did not notice a big difference between the elections in the EU and in Russia

[Headline] Foreign election monitors did not notice a big difference between the elections in the EU and in Russia.



Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation. euvsdisinfo.eu/report/international-observers-impressed-by-the-elections-in-russia/,

According to the preliminary OSCE international conclusions, the 18 March presidential election in Russia took place in an overly controlled legal and political environment marked by continued pressure on critical voices, while the Central Election Commission (CEC) administered the election efficiently and openly. After intense efforts to promote turnout, citizens voted in significant numbers, yet restrictions on the fundamental freedoms of assembly, association and expression, as well as on candidate registration, have limited the space for political engagement and resulted in a lack of genuine competition.

There has never been such a “Novichok” poisonous substance in the world

Prime Minister Theresa May was directly deceiving the deputies, while talking about the Russian poisonous substance “Novichok”. Deceiving, because there has never been such a poisonous substance in the world and never was: there has never been a project to develop this substance neither in the USSR nor in Russia. […] It turns out that May invented herself such a substance – ‘Novichok’.



Many competing and contradictory stories promulgated by Russian state-controlled media, the only connecting thread being to confuse their audience and exclude any possibility of Russian involvement. https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?text=sergei+skripal&disinfo_issue=&date=

The nerve agent has been identified as Novichok (which means newcomer in Russian). It is series of nerve agents and is known to be more powerful than VX and was developed in Russia in the 1970s and 1980s. https://www.voanews.com/a/british-prime-minister-russia-poisoning-spy/4294683.html It's so unusual, that very few scientists outside of Russia have any real experience in dealing with it and no country outside of Russia is known to have developed the substance. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/europe/what-is-novichok-nerve-agent-intl/index.html, https://theconversation.com/what-we-know-about-novichok-the-newby-nerve-agents-linked-to-russia-93264