Disinfo: Dangerous American labs close to the Russian border

Summary

The coronavirus pandemic should prompt many civilian institutions to take a fresh look at the Pentagon’s bio-labs. The first and only protest to date has taken place in Ukraine. There are 15 laboratories in this country, in which the United States sponsors biological research. Nobody builds biological facilities that run on dangerous toxins and pathogens in densely populated areas. But the Americans went even further, not only to transfer their laboratories from their densely populated areas, but to transfer them to other countries. Such laboratories close to the Russian border are simply pushing the Americans into dangerous experiments. And the existence of unfriendly countries like Ukraine and Georgia fuels this desire.

Disproof

This is a recurring conspiracy theory alleging that the United States develops biological weapons around the world, consistent with the Pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign against biological laboratories in Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine and other countries. The conspiracy about US biolabs in countries bordering Russia aiming to encircle Moscow and spread infectious diseases is a part of a years-long disinformation campaign led by the Kremlin. In fact, biological laboratories are involved in preventing the risks of complex diseases and, together with other similar projects, counteracting bioterrorism. In Ukraine, the claim often refers to the Science and Technology Center in Ukraine (STCU), which is an intergovernmental organisation established in an international agreement in 1993. Its mission is to support civilian science, technology partnerships and collaboration through chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear risk mitigation. The projects of STCU partners include research on adjuvant for improvement of cancer vaccines, detecting trace impurities in biological tissues, human vision diagnostics, and therapy among many others. In Georgia, it is the Richard Lugar Centre for Public Health Research, which is a facility of the National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health (NCDC). It is a top-tiered institution in NCDC’s laboratory network and serves as a reference laboratory for Georgia’s public health system. Read more about the disinformation campaign surrounding the Lugar Laboratory on Myth Detector. Furthermore, the US Department of Defence’s Biological Threat Reduction Programme collaborates with partner countries to counter the threat of outbreaks (deliberate, accidental or natural) of the world’s most dangerous infectious diseases. Read a similar case that the US tests biological weapons on Ukrainians to further attack Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 209
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 24/08/2020
  • Outlet language(s) Arabic, English
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Georgia, US, Ukraine, Russia
  • Keywords: coronavirus, Lugar Laboratory, laboratory, Biological weapons, Encircling Russia, Chemical weapons/attack, SBU, Conspiracy theory
see more

Disinfo: The West has an interest in the death of Navalny to launch a new wave of sanctions against Russia

The tragic death of Alexei Navalny (who is still alive) is in the interest of the West to spark a new wave of sanctions and black PR against Russia. If Putin had feared Navalny, he would get rid of him in a more acceptable way a long time ago.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Navalny poisoning. Similar narrative as in the case of Skripal, based on conspiracies, denials and fabrication in order to cover up Russia's responsibility. Russian propaganda has long been pursuing the claims that the Skripal case was made up to justify sanctions against Russia and was an example of Russophobia. Background: Russian opposition leader and a critic of Vladimir Putin Alexey Navalny has been suffering from suspected poisoning. He fell ill during a flight and the plane to make an emergency landing in Omsk, where doctors said he was in a coma and they were trying to save his life. Siberian doctors denied allegations on poisoning. Navalny has been transferred to Berlin and is receiving treatment at Berlin's Charite Hospital. The EU High Representative Josep Borell condemns in a statement what seems to be an attempt on Mr. Navalny's life.

Disinfo: Only traces of alcohol and caffeine were found in Navalny's blood

Specialists conducted a series of tests, three independent laboratories were doing it at once. They excluded the version of poisoning, as only traces of alcohol and caffeine were found.

[…]

The patient [Alexei Navalny] will not be treated in Europe’s largest hospital – Charite. It was a specialist of this clinic which confirmed the poisoning of Yushchenko during the Orange Revolution, although Yushchenko refused to give another blood sample and the investigation to this day tries to determine not who was guilty, but whether he was poisoned at all.

Disproof

The preliminary test results from the Charité – Universitätsmedizin hospital in Berlin indicate that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was poisoned during his stay in Siberia.

Clinical findings indicate poisoning with a substance from the group of cholinesterase inhibitors. The specific substance involved remains unknown.

Disinfo: Protests in Belarus are coordinated by Western countries and the opposition wants bloodshed

Ongoing protests in Belarus are coordinated from the West which wants to transform the country to meet its interests. The Belarusian opposition located in Western countries does not want the protests to be peaceful but rather seeks bloodshed. Tsikhanouskaya is now under pressure in Lithuania.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about protests in Belarus. The European Union has not recognised the election because of widespread reports of vote-rigging. European Council President Charles Michel stated that “[t]he protests in Belarus are not about geopolitics. This is about the right of the People to freely elect their leadership”. The protests do not have a co-ordinator but are rather organised locally in reaction to current events. Svetlana Tikhanovskaya is now referred to as the opposition leader. She was the other presidential candidate who left for Lithuania after detention and pressure in Belarus and is now safe according to the Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius. She has called for an end to the violence and for peaceful protests. She also urged the current Belarusian authorities to engage in a dialogue with the protesters to resolve the situation. See similar cases claiming that the actions of the protesters in Belarus are controlled by foreign centres, that the West is using the "colour revolutions" methodologies in Belarus or that USA, NATO and EU want to dictate a regime-change to the people of Belarus.