Disinfo: The Deep State won’t allow Biden to soften US policy towards China


US intelligence agencies announced that they had uncovered a Chinese intelligence operative who took part actively in the political life of the Democrats in California, a woman called Christine Fang who moved to San Francisco in 2011 and had intimate relationships with politicians, including several mayors and city counsellors, and who, when she realised she was under surveillance, unexpectedly left California and returned to China. It is curious that this story, which lasted for many years, was made public right now when there is a power transition in the US. The Biden Administration may softer the tough course that Trump maintained towards China, but as those leaks show, the Deep State won’t allow it.


While the story of Christine Fang is true, there is no evidence that its publication is the result of a leak from the US intelligence services for political reasons. The story was first reported by Axios on December 7, 2020, which claimed that it was the result of a one year investigation. Claims about global elites secretly ruling the world, and specifically a so-called ‘Deep State’ in the United States who rule above elected officials, are a well-established pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative aiming to question the legitimacy of democracy and Western institutions.

See other examples of this disinformation narrative in our database, such as claims that the result of the US 2020 election doesn’t matter because the real ruler is the Deep State, which will kill any US president that confronts it and is moving the country towards war with Iran and Russia; that Hillary Clinton published the Deep State strategy for the world; or that Covid-19 vaccines will lead to full spectrum dominance.


  • Reported in: Issue 224
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 08/12/2020
  • Language/target audience: Spanish, Castilian, Russian
  • Country: China, US
  • Keywords: Democratic Party (US), Deep state, Intelligence services, Joe Biden


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Brussels strikes Christians over holidays, recommending ban on Christmas services

Brussels strikes Christians for the holidays. The quasi-official rumour that those in the European Commission want to “recommend” the ban on Christmas services (ie to move online). Well, the rumour is no longer a rumour, but news transmitted by the media. /…/ In conclusion: another step in the “battle against the Christian Faith“


The statement was made on December 2 and refers to the draft of Anti-Covid Recommendations, adopted by the European Commission the next day, on December 3. In fact, the document does not contain any specific reference to religious services or Christmas, does not prohibit anything, but recommends states to maintain and even intensify anti-Covid measures. "Provide guidance and advice on overnight visitors and visits to households (particularly in case of night curfews). Encourage the organization of online social gatherings and events, such as workplace end-of-year celebrations. In case of ceremonies, consider avoiding large services or using online, TV or radio broadcasts, allocating specific spots for close families ('household bubbles#) to sit together, and banning of communal singing. The use of masks is particularly relevant during these types of gatherings," it is said in the Recommendations of the European Commission.

The draft of these Recommendations was used by the pro-Kremlin media to promote the narrative that the EU is an anti-Christian space. See here a similar case claiming that the Council of Europe and the European Union are not a bearer of Christian moral values.

For the West, Russia is an enemy that must be surrounded with military bases

Another reason for the growth of neo-Nazi sentiments is a kind of politics of “historical memory” in the young states of Europe that originated from the USSR. The ruling elites of these countries are building their own version of national history – the opposite to the one introduced into public consciousness during the Soviet period. As a result, often along with the restoration of historical justice, either open accomplices of Hitler’s National Socialism or radical nationalists not directly connected with the Nazi regime in Germany, become national heroes.

Besides objective reasons, subjective reasons also contribute to the growth of neo-Nazi and nationalist sentiments in Europe and America. For the collective West, Russia is an enemy that must be surrounded on all sides with military bases and must be imposed with sanctions. For this, even the falsification of history is enough.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about historical revisionism and Western belligerence towards Russia. There is no evidence that the West sees Russia as an enemy.

The Kremlin’s policy of historical revisionism accuses the West and particular EU members such as the Baltic states and Poland of the “falsification and re-writing” of WWII history. European states are continuously accused of their support for the Nazi or Fascist ideology. Any disagreement with the Kremlin's official view on the history of WWII is automatically labelled by Russia as support for “Nazism” or “falsification of history”.

Ukraine is facing a second Donbas in Transcarpathia

Ukraine will have to fight another civil war if Kyiv decides to deploy troops in Transcarpathia.


A recurring narrative about Ukrainian-Hungarian relations promoted by pro-Kremlin disinformation actors.

Ukrainian officials and authorities never indicated or attempted to introduce any form of tighter military rule or martial law specifically over Transcarpathia. In addition, the Hungarian ethnic community's representatives are not in any way advocating for breaking away with Ukraine. The latter is a Kremlin-pushed narrative to increase social tensions in Ukraine.