Disinfo: Democrats to blame for Covid-19 related deaths, as they control the drugs against the virus


The Democratic party must be blamed for Covid-19 related deaths. They have influenced the decision about which drug has to be used against the virus. Because of them, use of the more effective Plaquenil was cancelled, and now, the less effective Remdesivir is used. Democrats use all means to return to power.


Conspiracy theory on the link between Covid-19 and the Democratic Party.

Relevant agencies, not politicians make the decisions about medical treatments. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for approving certain medications. At the moment, Remdesivir is the only drug approved by the FDA for emergency use against the novel coronavirus. In June, FDA revoked hydroxychloroquine and Plaquenil, explaining that "this drug may not be effective to treat COVID-19 and that the drug’s potential benefits for such use do not outweigh its known and potential risks."

Information about Gilead, Remdesivir manufacturer company, is public. The links between this team and the Democratic Party are not confirmed with any evidence.

The Democratic Party has been the target of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign. This campaign intensified after the protests amid George Floyd's death, claiming that the protests and the unrest were organised by the Democratic party in order to defeat Donald Trump and return to power.


  • Reported in: Issue 205
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 04/07/2020
  • Language/target audience: Georgian
  • Country: US
  • Keywords: coronavirus, Democratic Party (US)


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Homosexual and other minority rights are not violated in Russia, the West misinterprets

The article 6.21. of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation (Propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations among minors) is misinterpreted in some Western countries. All accusations that say that repressive measures emanate from the state against the LGBT community are refuted.
In certain Republics, the historical roots have their peculiarity which cannot be abstracted. But overall, i
n Russia no LGBT rights are not violated.


Recurrent narrative about the absence of violation of LGBTs rights in Russia and claiming that the 2013 law against Gay propaganda is widely misinterpreted in western countries.

The Russian presidency was asked to comment its attitude towards LGBT minorities following the publication of several pieces of news:

Russian expert reveals that the Ukrainian army downed flight MH17, then destroyed evidence

Russian independent expert Yuri Antipov, who carried out his own investigation about the Malaysia Boeing accident over Donbas in 2014, provided new evidence that Kyiv was involved in the death of thousands of passengers. This specialist showed a series of pictures that prove the vile plan of the Ukrainian government, confirming what Kyiv has been trying to hide for years: Ukraine’s armed forces destroyed material evidence by shooting heavy fire on the wreckage of the plane, as evidenced by the huge crates on the fuselage. According to Antipov, the Ukrainian army delayed the investigative work for as long as possible. The new information shows that the Ukrainian armed forces were tasked to destroy or deform parts of the crashed plane, which was necessary to confound the investigation as much as possible and take it to a dead end. Kyiv did everything at hand to interfere in the investigation, and a campaign of fake propaganda was actively carried out against Russia from the beginning.


Recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the downing of the flight MH17 over Ukraine, aiming to discredit the ongoing criminal trial in The Netherlands and to deny Russia’s responsibility, despite massive evidence on the contrary.

There years ago, this same Russian 'independent expert', Yuriy Antipov, claimed that MH-17 crashed because of an explosion on board. He claimed that a bomb was planted on the aeroplane in the Netherlands. Also, in 2017, Antipov said that a BUK missile system, shown on videos by the Investigation Team (JIT), was brought there by Ukrainian forces. In a similar article for News Front, published on 29 June 2020, Antipov claimed that the investigation stubbornly denies the facts indicating an explosion inside the plane cabin and that Malaysian experts long time ago found a radio recording edited in several parts. Read full debunk here.

Europe’s position in the situation with Sputnik Estonia – criminal silence

Estonian authorities continue to restrict the activities of Sputnik Estonia, violating the principles of freedom of speech. Sputnik Estonia has become the clearest example of the fight against dissent in the Baltic region. Europe’s attitude towards Sputnik Estonia is frightening. Brussels is silent and this is criminal silence. This frees up the hands of other countries that are beginning to study Estonia’s experience in closing Sputnik. The reaction of European structures shows that there is no freedom of speech in the Baltic countries. European organisations chose the non-interference position only because they are talking about the Russian media.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the undemocratic EU. It also contains recurring pro-Kremlin narratives about the West's deliberate anti-Russian activities, double standards. This claim tries to show sanctions against Russia, due to its illegal actions in Ukraine, as unfair persecution against Sputnik and its employees and against  Russian media in general.

In Estonia, Sputnik is represented as a "victim of unprecedented persecution" and example of the fight against dissent in the Baltic region. These kinds of statements were debunked several times. All actions taken by Estonia in relation to Sputnik are aimed at economic activity and not against the outlet's news content, and have a basis in both EU (see Art. 2(1)) and Estonian (see para. 93.1) legislation. The Article 2 of the Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine foresees freezing the assets of Dmitry Kiselyov, the Director-General of Rossija Segodnya. According to the articles of association of the company, the Director-General has the right to decide upon opening bank accounts and carry out invoicing. This corresponds to the condition "having the right to use all or part of the assets of a legal person or entity" in the EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures. "This means that if Rossiya Segodnya, which is controlled by Dmitry Kiselyov, against whom sanctions have been imposed, has assets in Estonia, they must be frozen and access must not be given to funds or economic resources, that is provide services that would enable Rossiya Segodnya to do business. When it comes to Estonia, this prohibition applies to people operating in the territory of Estonia," head of anti-money laundering authority the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), Madis Reimand, said.