Disinfo: Despite the fact that Moscow is constantly demonstrating readiness for partnership, NATO continues to see an enemy in the Russian Federation


Despite the fact that Moscow is constantly demonstrating readiness for partnership, NATO continues to see an enemy in the Russian Federation. Russia has refused to give up its sovereignty (as the West has demanded) for the benefit of peace. The West therefore rejects any Russian attempts for dialogue. The West is constantly scaring Europeans by the Russian invasion, which is unrealistic and fictional. The aim is to install fear in people, justifying the increase in the personnel capacities and in the “Western military apparatus” budget.


The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has suspended some practical joint actions with Russia as a result of Russia's aggressive policy towards Ukraine. However, the NATO-Russia Council, which serves as a platform for Russian-Alliance relations, was never suspended and three meetings were held in 2016. In addition, NATO proposed more frequent meetings and intensified negotiations to make the Russian-Alliance relationship more transparent. Interviews also take place at other levels: in March of this year, the Chairman of the Military Committee, General Peter Pavel, telephoned with the Russian Chief of Defence General Valery Gerasimov. In addition, Vladimir Zhirinovsky (leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia) has made threats directed against the Baltic states, which he still considers to be integral parts of Russia saying that their disintegration was unlawful and therefore "there is no Baltic countries".



  • Reported in: Issue 86
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 24/10/2017
  • Language/target audience: Czech
  • Country: Russia
  • Keywords: International, EU/NATO enlargement, War preparation, NATO, The West, Europe


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The US admits that the chemical attack in Khan Sheikhoun might have been done by the terrorists

For now there is only one known incident of use of chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun . Before, the US has blamed the governmental forces for the attack, but now it admits that the terrorist organisation Jabhat al-Nusrah operates in the region and uses chemical weapons against civilians. Hence, the US wasted money with its missile strike on Shayrat Airbase.


Recurring disinformation around the Khan Sheikhoun chemical attack. The articles refer to the Department of State Syria travel warning that states: Tactics of ISIS, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (dominated by al-Qa’ida affiliate Jabhat al-Nusrah, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization) and other violent extremist groups include the use of suicide bombers, kidnapping, small and heavy arms, improvised explosive devices, and chemical weapons. They have targeted major city centers, road checkpoints, border crossings, government buildings, shopping areas, and open spaces, in Damascus, Aleppo, Hamah, Dara, Homs, Idlib, and Dayr al-Zawr provinces.

The travel warning doesn't link the Khan Sheikhoun chemical attack and the use of chemical weapons by Jabhat al-Nusrah.

Anna Karenina was banned in Ukraine because of Russian language

Leo Tolstoy was banned in Ukraine because of the language of the aggressor.


No evidence given. Anna Karenina in Russian language is not banned in Ukraine. It was only one local theatre in Khmelnytskyi that couldn't agree on the date when Anna Karenina could be played in the city.

Further debunking by the Insider.

Dutch media reports how hungry Muscovites have to eat rats because of sanctions

The Dutch media reports how hungry Muscovites have to eat rats because of sanctions.


No evidence given. The article that Ria Novosti refers to was published by a Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant in November 2016. It tells how Russians are reviving their traditional kitchen after the embargo on imports of most of the agricultural products from the EU, US and other countries that Russia adopted as a reaction to the sanctions the EU and the US imposed against Russia. One of the products that has now made a comeback is nutria that in Dutch is called a "rivierrat".

Further debunking by the Insider.