Disinfo: Political regime in Lithuania is Russophobic


People in Lithuania are humiliated by political parties and coalitions.

Lithuanian foreign policy denies any initiatives of peaceful coexistence with Minsk and Russia. Today Lithuania is a country-saboteur in Eastern Europe. It is absolutely stuck in anti-Russian and anti-Belarusian politics […]

Changes are possible only after the bankruptcy of the current Lithuanian regime.


The message is linked to political changes in Lithuania after the 2020 parliamentarian elections but uses a broader context accusing the Lithuanian authorities of Russophobia and anti-Belarusian policies.

One of the narratives attacks the “Lithuanian political regime” in general. It is portrayed as anti-popular and repressive by its nature. This statement is not backed up with any evidence. In the ranking Freedom of the World (by Freedom House) Lithuania is defined as a free country. Its score is 91 points (from 100). In comparison, Russia gains only 20 points in this ranking and is classified as not free.

The article also contains another disinformation narrative accusing Lithuania of implementing an anti-Russian (and anti-Belarusian) policy. In the broader context, this is linked to the Lithuanian authorities' critical evaluation of Russian aggression against Ukraine as well as its support for citizens movements against the authoritarian regime in Belarus. Kremlin propaganda has traditionally accused Lithuania of Russophobia. See similar cases here and here.

Lithuania is often portrayed (together with Poland and other Western countries) as an organiser and coordinator of the protests in Belarus. See examples here, here, and here.

There is no evidence that Lithuania or any other Western governments are involved in any way in the protests in Belarus. Large-scale protests began in Minsk on August 9 against the results of the presidential election, and then in other cities. People revolted against election fraud and police violence towards thousands of rally participants.


  • Reported in: Issue 220
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 16/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Lithuanian
  • Country: Russia, Lithuania, Belarus
  • Keywords: Russophobia


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

British intelligence connected to international terrorism and Litvinenko’s murder

On March 25, 2013, he [Berezovsky] planned to travel to Israel and even bought tickets. But instead of boarding cards, he was given a ticket to heaven. He knew too much about the British intelligence services’ true connections with international terrorists and their role in Litvinenko’s death.


A conspiracy narrative. No evidence given to link British intelligence to international terrorism. Neither are the accusations made in enough detail to support such a huge claim.

Berezovsky had the status of political refugee in London over unfounded charges in Russia and confrontation with its president Vladimir Putin. A conspiracy theory that he was probably killed by British intelligence is recurrent.

US Embassy in Tbilisi set rules for Georgian election

Take, for example, the last parliamentary elections in Georgia. The election was held in accordance with the rules set out at the US Embassy in Tbilisi.


A conspiracy theory in this op-ed for Spuntik Azeri about the recent Parliamentary elections in Georgia claiming that they were held in accordance with the rules set out at the US Embassy in Tbilisi. ODIHR’s Limited Election Observation Mission in their statement of preliminary findings and conclusions stated that, “The elections were conducted under a substantially revised legal framework that provided a sound basis for holding democratic elections”.

A similar election watch report was issued by The National Democratic Institute. (NDI) The report notes that, “The 31 October parliamentary elections were competitive and, overall, fundamental freedoms were respected”.

Navalny could have been poisoned with Novichok in Germany

There is every reason to believe that Navalny could have been exposed to Novichok in Germany or on his way there.

How else can the sudden appearance of toxins in Navalny’s blood samples be explained? After all, the tests which Navalny underwent in Russia found no trace of toxic substances.

Despite no solid evidence proving this, Russia was very quickly accused of using a banned nerve agent and punished with EU sanctions.


This claim is part of a wider set of conspiracy theories promulgated by pro-Kremlin media in relation to the August 2020 poisoning of Alexei Navalny. It also advances the recurring pro-Kremlin narrative casting a substantial chunk of Western decision-making as motivated by anti-Russian sentiment.

This claim is made without evidence and paints a truly remarkable version of events, according to which Navalny fell ill in Russia and slipped into a coma for reasons totally unrelated to poison. He was then flown to Germany where he was administered a deadly nerve agent, and then immediately treated both for poisoning with said agent and for the mysterious illness he had developed back in Russia, resulting in his full recovery.