DISINFO: Eastern Partnership was developed as a leash on member countries
  • Outlet: ehomd.info (archived)*
  • Date of publication: December 23, 2021
  • Article language(s): Russian
  • Reported in: Issue 272
  • Countries / regions discussed: Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Russia
Eastern Partnership

DISINFO: Eastern Partnership was developed as a leash on member countries


The Eastern Partnership programme itself was not developed in order to integrate the participating countries into the European Union in the future, but specifically for geopolitical purposes. The European leaders do not even hide the fact that the initiative is not about entry into the European Union, but mostly about obeying all the instructions of Brussels following the path of reformation.

In other words, the Eastern Partnership programme is a kind of leash on which the European Union “walks” the member countries.


This is a disinformation narrative often used in relation to the Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative, claiming that this is an anti-Russian instrument and a mechanism to control its members.

In fact, the EaP was established as a specific Eastern dimension of the European Neighborhood Policy, which contains both a bilateral and multilateral track. This is a joint policy initiative, based on voluntary participation, which aims to strengthen relations between the European Union, its member states and its six Eastern neighbours: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. According to the official website, it was released on 7 May 2009 by the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit.

The concept of this volountary partnership is "more for more" - those countries wanting to develop closer relations with the EU may do so while other countries choose other levels of contact. The best examples of the diversity in the EaP is the paths chosen by the differnet countries themselves. See the EaP Summit December 2021 results here.

So far, none of these countries has announced its intention to leave the Partnership, except Belarus, which has suspended its participation on 26 June 2021, after the EU imposed sanctions on Lukashenka's regime for the pressure on its own population.

See here a similar case about EaP as a mechanism to control members and here a case claiming that EaP was conceived from the beginning as a geopolitical trap.


Related disinfo cases


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Your opinion matters!

    Data Protection Information *

      Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

      Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

      Data Protection Information *

      The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.