Disinfo: Eastern Partnership was developed as a leash on member countries

Summary

The Eastern Partnership programme itself was not developed in order to integrate the participating countries into the European Union in the future, but specifically for geopolitical purposes. The European leaders do not even hide the fact that the initiative is not about entry into the European Union, but mostly about obeying all the instructions of Brussels following the path of reformation.

In other words, the Eastern Partnership programme is a kind of leash on which the European Union “walks” the member countries.

Disproof

This is a disinformation narrative often used in relation to the Eastern Partnership (EaP) initiative, claiming that this is an anti-Russian instrument and a mechanism to control its members.

In fact, the EaP was established as a specific Eastern dimension of the European Neighborhood Policy, which contains both a bilateral and multilateral track. This is a joint policy initiative, based on voluntary participation, which aims to strengthen relations between the European Union, its member states and its six Eastern neighbours: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. According to the official website, it was released on 7 May 2009 by the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit.

The concept of this volountary partnership is "more for more" - those countries wanting to develop closer relations with the EU may do so while other countries choose other levels of contact. The best examples of the diversity in the EaP is the paths chosen by the differnet countries themselves. See the EaP Summit December 2021 results here.

So far, none of these countries has announced its intention to leave the Partnership, except Belarus, which has suspended its participation on 26 June 2021, after the EU imposed sanctions on Lukashenka's regime for the pressure on its own population.

See here a similar case about EaP as a mechanism to control members and here a case claiming that EaP was conceived from the beginning as a geopolitical trap.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 272
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 23/12/2021
  • Article language(s) Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Russia
  • Keywords: Eastern Partnership

Belarus

see more

NATO expands Eastwards to threaten and provoke Russia

NATO expands eastwards to threaten and provoke Russia. The Russian demand that NATO should not move further into Ukraine and Georgia is absolutely understandable. But the US will not want to concede this security guarantee voluntarily because of its ongoing hegemonic mania.

NATO's claims on Ukraine deeply worry Moscow. Russia cannot watch indifferently as the Alliance's military infrastructure begins to move toward Russian borders. Russia was only asking the West not to station NATO military infrastructure in Eastern Europe. Rejection of Moscow's demands testifies to disinterest in compromise and strategic dialogue with Russia.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming that NATO's 'expansion' is a security threat for Russia.

NATO does not seek confrontation with Russia and poses no threat to Russia. NATO is a defensive alliance, whose primary aims are to maintain peace and safeguard the independence, security and territorial integrity of its members. During the Warsaw summit in July 2016, NATO has made it clear that "The Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia". This was also reaffirmed in the Brussels Summit Communiqué of 14 June 2021.

The West is developing a Ukrainian version of the "White Helmets" known from Syria

Kyiv, in coordination with Western countries, is preparing for a scenario in Donbas similar to what happened in Syria. A chemical provocation attack into the Donbas region following the models of the Syrian "White Helmets".

It cannot be ruled out that there was an attempt in the Donbas to carry out a provocation, similar to the one that took place (or was being prepared) in Syria with the participation of the notorious “White Helmets.”

Disproof

A new pro-Kremlin media accusations presented without any evidence while blending in a recurring disinformation narrative used in the Syrian conflict that aims to paint the humanitarian group White Helmets as terrorists.

The OSCE Monitoring Mission in Ukraine has not reported any trace or sign of such an attack or preparations.

Kyiv still does not respect the Minsk Agreements

Kyiv is still not respecting the Minsk agreements on the settlement of the crisis. Holding of a new summit of the "Normandy Four" - Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany - depends on the Ukrainian government's compliance with its obligations under the agreements.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative claiming that Ukraine is not willing to implement the Minsk agreements, and Ukraine's position is the only obstacle on the way to the peace process in Donbas.

Contrary to the claims, the main impediment to a peace settlement in Donbas is, in fact, Russia’s and its proxies’ deliberate unwillingness to implement the Minsk agreements. These documents provide, among other things, for a comprehensive ceasefire and withdrawal of foreign troops from Ukraine. Kyiv announced a truce in July 2020, but the Moscow-backed separatists have been violating it virtually every day.

Subscribe to the DISINFO REVIEW

Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

No, thank you.