Disinfo: The escalation in Nagorno Karabakh is led by British intelligence services

Summary

At the bottom of the events in Nagorno Karabakh we find the long-dated rivalry between Great Britain and the US, on one side, and Russia and France on the other. Some argue that the escalation of the conflict is led by the head of the MI6, Richard Moore, a specialist in Turkish affairs. The logic of the current events is leading to an extremely dangerous clash between Moscow and Ankara in the region, and other players will benefit of all this.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory with no proof presented to support any of the claims, mixing several recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about an aggressive West and Russia as the ultimate target of international events. There is no evidence that foreign powers had anything to do with the 2020 military escalation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, much less with the purpose of benefitting from a confrontation between Russia and Turkey.

See other examples in our database, such as claims the escalation in the Caucasus is directed against Russia, because someone wants to divert Moscow’s attention from Belarus and Syria; that the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh is a cover up operation, as was the 1956 Hungarian Revolution; that Ukraine is sending weapons and nationalist fighters to this war theatre; that the US embassy in Armenia is a mini-Pentagon escalating tension in the region and the Middle East; or that the US is encircling Russia with biological labs for a future attack and is ready to carry out a false flag operation in Alaska to blame Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 216
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 01/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Spanish, Castilian
  • Country: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, UK, Russia, France
  • Keywords: Nagorno-Karabakh, MI6

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The protests in Kyrgyzstan were pre-planned and have nothing to do with elections

What happens in Kyrgyzstan represents an absolutely precisely planned and organised event. It doesn’t matter how the elections ended, the protests have nothing to do with these. Elections were just a pretext. 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about a "colour revolution" in Kyrgyzstan.

The protests in Kyrgyzstan erupted to contest the results of the parliamentary elections that took place on 4 October, which are considered unfair by opposition parties. As a result of the elections, none of the twelve established opposition parties secured seats in the parliament. The parties declared they would not recognise the results of the voting. The president and the ruling parties were accused of vote-buying and voter intimidation. 

Ukraine, Armenia and Azerbaijan have never been independent states

The main mechanism why Armenia and Azerbaijan are failing (in politics) is that they are not independent states. They have no history, neither Ukraine.

Disproof

This is an example of a pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Russian world applied to Armenia, Azerbaijan and Ukraine. The narrative also represents the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Ukraine, Armenia and Azerbaijan are sovereign countries and are well-defined nation-states with a long history; all 3 nations preserved language, literature and identity, despite foreign rule for long periods.

The aim of the Konev Monument removal is to humiliate Russia and damage its prestige

Due to the several important events of the past six months, the barbaric act of the authorities of the municipality of Prague 6 somehow faded. With the demolition of the Konev monument, Kolář and Co. pursued the goal of provoking the Russians into violent retaliatory actions.

The aim of the provocative action of the Prague authorities is to humiliate Russia and damage its prestige and authority. This event is from the same series as the decision of the European Parliament to equate the USSR and Hitler’s Germany, or as the statement by Polish President Andrzej Duda about Stalin and Hitler as equally important culprits in the outbreak of World War II. These are all links of the same chain.

Disproof

This is a recurring disinformation narrative about the statue of Marshall Konev in Prague. It is also consistent with common pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about Russophobia and the supposedly hostile anti-Russian intentions of the West, based on which Russia can cast itself as the victim.

The democratically elected municipal council of Prague 6 voted for the removal of the statue. Basing on the protocol of the Politbureau's assembly, Czech historians established that on 8-14 May 1968, Konev chaired the Soviet military delegation sent to Prague to prepare the military invasion of Czechoslovakia. Konev was also chief of the Soviet troops in East Germany during the Berlin wall crisis in 1961. In other words, the Red Army brought not only liberation but also terror to Czechia, as the mayor of Prague 6, Ondřej Kolář reminded.