Disinfo: Estonia’s e-voting can be hacked


Back in 2013, during the security audit of the electronic voting system, a high level vulnerability was discovered. This means that the system can be hacked and, as a result, the election results can be falsified.


The article refers to a report from 2013 and its author. The report claimed the e-voting system included lax and inconsistent operational security, insufficient transparency measures for proving an honest count, and a software design that was vulnerable to attack from foreign powers. However, according to the Estonian Electoral Committee representative, they have had no cooperation or contact with the group in question.

Moreover, “The timing is suspicious for us, with it being announced right before the election process begins. We are really happy with constructive criticism, but there is nothing that we see in the report that we already did not know and have been addressing."

E-voting is a secure digital process that has been studied a number of times over the last 15 years.

There have also been attempts to break it both consciously (when testing the security of the system) and with slightly more malicious intent. There is no record of a single verified incident of anyone having succeeded in changing, erasing or adding an electronic vote in a way not in accordance with the Elections Act and other public rules.

The pro-Kremlin media has also falsely claimed that e-votes are not secret and benefit right-wing parties.


  • Reported in: Issue 220
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 16/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Estonia
  • Keywords: Elections


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Russian coronavirus vaccine has dozens of orders unlike the American one

The anti coronavirus vaccine from the American company Moderna is unlikely to leave the United States in the near future. The vaccine turned out to be very expensive and it is unlikely that poor states can afford it. So no one is queuing up for the American novelty yet.

After the world’s first official registration of the Russian drug Sputnik V, dozens of countries have already applied for its purchase.


The Pro-Kremlin outlet Vesti refers to the Guardian when it claims Moderna is too expensive to become popular among poorer countries, but it appears to mix up two vaccines. The original publication by the Guardian says that Moderna vaccine against coronavirus is more affordable than Pfizer: "The second reason to applaud is that Moderna’s vaccine can be kept in an ordinary fridge at 2 to 8C for a month. The big anxiety about the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is the need to keep it in what is known as ultra-cold chain – freezers running at between minus 70C and minus 80C. That makes it really hard in most countries to store and transport the vaccine, and nigh impossible in low-income countries, without substantial donor help."

To conclude its reporting, the disinformation outlet says that there are dozens of countries which have already applied for the purchase of the Russian vaccine in contrast to the American one for which "no one is queuing up".

Buk missile that shot down MH17 was Ukrainian and shot from Ukraine controlled territory

According to Russian Deputy Prosecutor General Nikolai Vinnichenko, Moscow has provided the Netherlands with documents proving that the missile belonged to Ukraine and that it was fired from an area controlled by the Ukrainian military. Investigators ignored this data. However, at the start of the trial, the investigating judge acknowledged having received this information from the Russian prosecution.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the downing of Flight MH17 .

The Dutch-led criminal investigation by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) has been ongoing since 2014. On 28 September 2016, the JIT announced that Flight MH17 was shot down by a missile from the 9M38 series, which was launched by a BUK TELAR missile system. The system was transported from the Russian Federation to an agricultural field near the town of Pervomaiskyi in Eastern Ukraine, from where the missile was launched. After firing, the system - with 1 missing missile - went back to the Russian Federation. On the 24th of May 2018, the JIT announced its conclusion that the BUK TELAR used to shoot down MH17 came from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, a unit of the Russian armed forces from Kursk in the Russian Federation.

Washington constantly meddles in Russian politics with NGOs and critics

The Russian Prosecutor’s Office has recorded the summary of the results of investigations into remittances from American non-profit organisations (NPOs) established in Russia. These examples are numerous […] These American organizations aim to impact the country’s policy.

Since 2012, a law has made it possible to label associations and NGOs receiving funding from outside Russia as “foreign agents”. The Memorial Association, a Russian NGO for the defence of human rights and the preservation of the memory of victims of Soviet-era repressions was thus recognised as a “foreign agent”.

Russia has never interfered in US internal affairs, and will not allow the US to meddle in Russia’s own affairs either.


Recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the US meddling in Russian politics through NGOs and human rights organisations.

The European Union has repeatedly stated that the Russian law on "foreign agents" and the ensuing fines, inspections and stigmatisation, further tighten the restrictions on the exercise of fundamental freedoms in Russia, consume the scarce resources of NGOs and inhibit independent civil society in the country. The EU has called to abandon the practice of branding Russian NGOs as "foreign agents", as well as all resulting administrative harassment.