Disinfo: EU initiated negotiations with Russian vaccine manufacturer

Summary

The European Union has begun negotiations with the manufacturer of Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine.

Disproof

The headline and the introductory paragraph of this story are deliberately misleading. The articles themselves say that it was the developer of the vaccine, Russia’s Gamaleya Centre, who contacted the European Medicines Agency in order to start conversations, a fact that was confirmed by the European Commission at the request of Sputnik.

On 25 November, a considerable number of pro-Kremlin Russian-speaking outlets published near-identical articles to the effect that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) had initiated negotiations with Russia's Gamaleya Institute, the manufacturer of the Sputnik V vaccine. A similar story claiming that the EU announced contacts with Russia about the Sputnik V vaccine has also been spread across different language versions of Sputnik on the same day.

In fact, there are no "negotiations" under way between the EU and the vaccine manufacturer, nor did any EU institution approach any Russian drug company to discuss vaccines. According to the European Commission spokesman for health, it was Gamaleya which contacted the EMA and not the other way around, and the contacts between the two bodies have so far been limited to "preliminary discussions" on an unspecified subject. Any mention of these contacts has yet to appear on the EMA website.

Several Russian outlets went even further than merely claiming that the EU is "negotiating" with Russian vaccine developers. Thus Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Russia's state-owned newspaper of record, reports that the "negotiations" specifically concern "Sputnik V deliveries to Europe." The TV channel Tsargrad states that "Europe swallowed its pride and initiated negotiations" with Gamaleya. According to the Kadara.ru website, the EU launched the negotiations "on the sly," whereas Krasnaya Vesna writes that "the EU is considering the possibility of studying the Sputnik V vaccine."

The distortion is an attempt to boost the legitimacy of the Sputnik V vaccine by implying that the European Union and its high regulatory standards may be interested in it. These articles were published one day after the head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund Kirill Dmitriev announced that Russia is discussing possible production of the Sputnik V vaccine in Germany and that RDIF expected a visit by a delegation from France the same week.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Russia destroyed its Novichok stockpile, but US continues to produce it

Russia has destroyed its entire stockpile of Novichok in line with OPCW protocols.

However, the US continues to research a wide array of chemical warfare agents, as it has been doing since the 1980s.

For political reasons, these toxic compounds are classified in the West as “novichok” which is a Russian word. The US authorities have registered over 140 patents related to the use of this type of chemical weapons.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Novichok.

In September 2017, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirmed the full destruction of the 39,967 tonnes of chemical weapons possessed by Russia, but Novichoks were never declared to the OPCW and were not included in the Chemical Weapons Convention until 2019.

“Psaking” meme became a symbol of stupidity of American diplomacy during the Obama administration

Jen Psaki returns. The very name Jen Psaki, when she was working for Obama, became a household name.

It was Psaki who calmly stated that gas in Europe flows from West to East, and she was not going to correct herself. It was she who was going to “send the fleet to the shores of Belarus.” She flogged nonsense about Ukraine and Donbass.

As a result, even the “psaking” meme appeared as a designation of presumptuous stupidity, which became a characteristic feature of all American diplomacy at that time. And then there were T-shirts with the slogan printed: “No psaking!”

Disproof

This Pro-Kremlin disinformation outlet attributes words to Jen Psaki which she never actually said and amplifies a mistake that she corrected. A Russian media and social media campaign against Jen Psaki started in 2014 over the US´ criticism of the Russian invasion of Crimea and Donbas.

One half-true episode happened on April 10, when Ms. Psaki was asked about Russian threats to cut off supplies of natural gas to Ukraine. At one point in her reply, she briefly reversed the direction in which Russian pipelines run, saying: “There are flows of gas, of natural gas I should say, that go through — from Western Europe through Ukraine to Russia, and we — or I’m sorry, the other way — from Russia through Ukraine to Western Europe.” So, she corrected herself immediately (see video available), while the pro-Kremlin outlet pretends that "she was not going to correct herself".

Pfizer used to fake clinical trials, from their reputation we can expect anything

Be curious, type Pfizer at least simply on Wikipedia, in Russian or English. And at the end of the article there will be the longest section “scandals”. They are a lot! You can shoot a detective series: from illegal tests on children with fatal outcomes to falsified trials, lies… <>

Do Pfizer’s top managers know something and expect stock prices to decline when it comes to the administrating the vaccine [against coronavirus] ? Given Pfizer’s reputation, one can expect anything.

Disproof

The pro-Kremlin disinformation outlet mixes up narratives, adding non existent claims to accusations advanced decades ago and settled with plaintiffs since then.

Thus, there are no credible accusations of Pfizer falsifying clinical trial results. Clinical trials are subject to government inspections, in particular, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in US, which has access to patients participating in clinical trials, to the documentation and other material evidence. The FDA did not accuse Pfizer of falsifying any clinical trials. Only Russian Wikipedia, accessed on November 30, 2020, failing to provide links to other sources, claims that an American medical journal did not have a response from Pfizer regarding a suspicion that part of the clinical trials of fluconazole in 1999 were falsified. In fact, FDA successfully registered Pfizer's fluconazole after the said clinical trials.