Disinfo: EU, NATO member states encourage closure of independent media

Summary

It is necessary to draw attention to the fact that in a number of EU and NATO member states, as well as in Ukraine, independent media are unceremoniously closed, and the leading Western capitals welcome and encourage these gross violations of the existing UN, OSCE and Council of Europe decisions on freedom of access to information.

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative accusing the West of double-standards and violating freedom of speech.

Under the “independent media” in Ukraine, the claim refers to the recent closure by Ukrainian authorities of three TV channels. According to the Ukrainian government and President Zelenskyy, the decision was linked to the implementation of personal sanctions against Taras Kozak. Economic and other restrictive measures were applied against the TV channels that he owns such as 112 Ukraine, ZIK and NewsOne after the decision of the National Security and Defence Council of UkraineAs stressed by Ukrainian President, Volodimir Zelenskyy, these channels were the source of disinformation and “earned money on the war”.

The decision to implement sanctions on Taras Kozak and his TV channels was supported by Ukrainian NGOs Countering Disinformation. In a joint statement, they stressed that these channels were tools of foreign influence operations, and were a systemic threat to the information security of Ukraine.

The Ukrainian media landscape has been and continues to be affected by sustained pro-Russian disinformation campaigns. While Ukraine’s efforts to protect its territorial integrity and national security, as well as to defend itself from information manipulation are legitimate, given the scale of disinformation campaigns affecting Ukraine including from abroad, this should not come at the expense of freedom of media and must be done in full respect of fundamental rights and freedoms and following international standards.

As regards the claim that 'some EU/ NATO member states' who "encourage these violations", pro-Kremlin media usually refer to the Baltic States with these claims. It is a common practice for pro-Kremlin media to blame the Baltic States for the discrimination against Russian language “independent” media. Most recently, on 9 February 2021, Latvia's broadcast regulator, the National Electronic Mass Media Council (NEPLP) removed 16 Russian TV channels the list of programmes that can be retransmitted into Latvia. NEPLP found that as of 1 February, the entity formerly bearing the legal right to distribute and retransmit these TV programmes no longer holds that right. The potential new distributor has so far been incapable of showing documentation that proves that it has the legal right to act in that capacity.

Similarly, the Lithuanian Radio and Television Commission found in January 2021 that Russian TV channel “RTR Planeta” violated the Lithuanian Law on the provision of the information to the public. In particular, the Commission found that paragraph 1(3) and paragraph 2 of Article 19 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Public Information were violated. A segment from the news programme “Vesti" disseminated on January 13 2021 about events in Vilnius on January 13 was judged to be disinformation and inciting hatred.

Read similar cases claiming that Ukraine and Baltics use restrictions against Russian media for their geopolitical goals, while the Baltic States continuously obstruct work of Russian media, that Russian journalists are being repressed in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Germany, France and the UK and that Lithuania violates the right of Russian speaking people to get information in their mother tongue.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 236
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 19/03/2021
  • Article language(s) , Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Russia, Ukraine, EU, Baltic states
  • Keywords: Media, Freedom of speech, NATO
see more

Joe Biden wants to provoke a New Cold War with Russia to distract the Americans from domestic problems

US President Joe Biden wants a new Cold War with Russia. Biden deliberately provokes Russia and seeks to bring about a new Cold War in order to distract US public opinion from domestic problems.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the US and the West allegedly pursuing a belligerent and hostile agenda against Russia. The article’s message is also consistent with the pro-Kremlin narrative that seeks to discredit US President Joe Biden.

There is no evidence to support the article’s claim that the Biden administration is seeking to launch a “Cold War” with Russia. The Biden administration reacted to specific Kremlin actions that harm the US and its allies, such as ongoing aggression against Ukraine, cyber-attacks, influence operations targeting the US 2020 elections. The administration has also denounced the violation of human and civil rights in Russia, such as the poisoning of an opposition politician Alexei Navalny.

Ukraine never had a legal right to Crimea

Ukraine has never had the legal right to Crimea. The peninsula has always been and will always remain Russian land.

Disproof

This is a recurring disinformation narrative from pro-Kremlin media trying to deny that Crimea is a part of Ukraine.

Crimea has a very long and complicated history with many peoples living there. Its population was diverse and included in various historical periods Crimean Tatars, Turks, Ukrainians, Russians, Greeks, Bulgarians, Armenians, Italians from Genoa, Urums, Karaites etc. Alans, Scythians, Sarmatians, Goths, Cimmerians, Huns and other ancient nations had also lived there.

NATO needs Georgia as a military platform for a conflict potential with Russia

Georgia, just like the Baltics, is a platform for the deployment of foreign NATO troops in possible operations against Russia, the long-term strategy does not provide for anything else, the leadership of NATO does not care much about the safety of the population of these republics.

[The NATO] partners need Georgia for the constant development of a conflict potential with Russia, and as a platform for the likely deployment of the NATO troops in the regional theatre of military operations. By agreeing to be a kind of anti-Russian "instrument" of the US and NATO in the Caucasus, the Georgian leadership deliberately "frames" its people.

Of course, in a situation of local (regional) conflict, none of the Western partners will sign up for a catastrophe for Georgia's sake . "Younger" allies are needed by the collective West as a consumable in the long-term confrontation with major opponents.

Disproof

This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO allegedly pursuing a belligerent and hostile agenda against Russia particularly in the Caucasus as well as about Georgia's cooperation with NATO.

The narrative is part of a larger campaign aiming to influence public support against Georgia's NATO aspirations and portraying neutrality as the most rational foreign policy choice for Georgia. Georgia's movement to join NATO was intensified after the de-facto occupation of a part of its territory.