Disinfo: EU sanctions on Syria unlawful and bypass the UN 

Summary

May 28, the European Union decided to extend its unlawful unilateral sanctions against Syria bypassing the UN Security Council…. Sanctions are supposedly aimed at protecting the civilian population in Syria, but in reality, they are crippling the Syrian economy and hit ordinary Syrians.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative trying to change the nature of sanctions implemented on Syria

EU sanctions on Syria are targeted at individuals and entities who ordered or carried out attacks and torture against their own people, made or used chemical weapons, built their personal fortune thanks to the war. EU sanctions are designed in a way that only targets these people and these activities, avoiding any negative impact on the population. See our video here for more details.

Within the context of the Syrian conflict, EU sanctions, imposed since 9 May 2011, respond to the repression perpetrated on the Syrian people by the Syrian regime and its supporters, including through the use of live ammunition against peaceful protesters and the regime’s involvement in the proliferation and use of chemical weapons.

On 27 May 2013, the Council of the EU adopted conclusions in which it condemned the violence and the continued widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights in Syria, which resulted into more restrictive measures against Syria on 31 May 2013, while the latest sanctions were adopted in May 2020.

The goal of these measures is to put pressure on the Syrian regime to halt its repression and negotiate a lasting political settlement of the Syrian crisis in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2254 under UN auspices. They are part and parcel of the EU’s wider approach to the Syria crisis, as outlined in the EU strategy on Syria.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 204
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30/06/2020
  • Language/target audience: Arabic
  • Country: Syria
  • Keywords: EU, European Union, Syrian War, Sanctions
see more

The Ukrainian regime is a junta led by war criminals

The majority of Ukrainians want to live in a country where Vladimir Putin is the president. So, this is not about them, it is about the junta of war criminals and foreign agents that were put in power by foreign secret services in Ukraine. This is a regime that occupied the country.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Ukraine's statehood which claims that the Euromaidan protests were organised by foreign forces.

It was not Western foreign agents, but Russia that triggered the military conflict after the Euromaidan in Ukraine. Ukraine is a sovereign state. Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity are respected by almost the whole world, except for Russia, which annexed Crimea via an internationally unrecognised referendum.

The US is preparing to renew nuclear tests

Moscow said that Washing had officially announced it would not ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and will “make the preparations” to resume nuclear tests.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative on the US' nuclear ambitions.

Although the US has not ratified the CTBT, it has not conducted a nuclear test explosion since 1992. No official announcements about making preparations to continue testing have been made, albeit the idea did come up at a meeting of senior officials on 15 May 2020, after allegations that Russia and China had been conducting low-yield nuclear tests. It has been reported that the proposal was shelved at the time.

Russian opposition recognises the vote for constitutional amendments

Legally flawless, completely safe medically – and politically convincing. In such a way, regional experts evaluated the procedure and results of the vote to amendments to the Russian Constitution. It was recognised even by representatives of the Russian opposition.

Disproof

One of the disinformation narratives about voting on amendments to the Russian Constitution.

According to the independent observers, such large-scale fraud, as during the voting on constitutional amendments, had not been seen since 2011.