Disinfo: EU funding aim to create a Maidan-like crisis in Belarus

Summary

The EU may collapse in the coming years as it cannot deal with migration crisis and political disagreements. Its unity is kept thanks to extensive development and enlargement. This is why Belarus is in the sphere of EU’s interests. The EU funds Belarusian nationalists, oppositions and NGOs and buys Belarusian officials with the aim to destabilize the country and create a Belarusian Maidan, followed by Belarus’ accession to the EU.

Disproof

No evidence given for the "Belarusian Maidan" or the EU's investment in its creation. The EU is not buying Belarusian officials. EU assistance to Belarus aims at improving the quality of life of Belarusian citizens in a tangible and visible manner, by strengthening its economy, governance, connectivity and society. Find out more about the EU assistance to Belarus here. The disinformation message is consistent with recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the Western attempts to instigate colour revolutions in EU neighbourhood. Examples of earlier disinformation with a similar narrative here and here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 135
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 03/02/2019
  • Outlet language(s) Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Belarus
  • Keywords: EU disintegration, European Union, Colour revolutions
see more

ECHR rejects an appeal against allowance to use grenades at demonstrations

The European Court of Human Rights rejected the appeals made to them, for the French security forces not to use grenades against civilians shows double standards.

Disproof

According to the European Court of Human Rights press release from December 18, 2018, on December 14, 2018, the Court received a lawyer's request to order, as soon as possible, provisional measures putting an end to inhuman and degrading treatment and violations of the right to life suffered by participants of the "yellow-vest" protests. The request was to urge France to temporarily ban the use of defence bullet launchers, as well as incapacitating liquids by the police. The request was made in relation to case Kazoua et al. vs France, registered under number 58803/18, a case alleging French police violence by 5 plaintiffs. The request was forwarded to a Chamber of the Court, pursuant to Rule 39 of the Rules, which rejected the request for an interim measure concerning the security forces’ use of flash-balls and incapacitating liquids. The Court grants the requests for interim measures only exceptionally, where the applicants would be exposed - in the absence of such measures - to a real risk of irreparable damage. This means that the ECHR did not rule on the case as such, neither did it in any way anticipate subsequent decisions on the admissibility or merits of the case before it. See more disinformation cases on yellow vests protests.

Ukraine is ruled by external forces

Ukraine is governed by the interests of other forces: Russian, American and European.

Disproof

No evidence given. Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the EU and US relations with Ukraine. Ukraine is an independent, sovereign state. No country is controlling Ukraine. The EU-Ukraine and US-Ukraine relations are built on the basis of equality, freedom, and independence. Ukraine builds its relations with other countries in accordance with the requirements of international law. In June 2014, EU and Ukraine signed An Association Agreement, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), which promotes deeper political ties, stronger economic links and the respect for common values. The current government in Ukraine was elected following elections held in 2014, which were recognised as legal and democratic by the observers. The Presidential elections were "largely in line with international commitments and fundamental freedoms," ODIHR's report states.

Ukraine banned Vkontakte as a result of Facebook lobbying

In 2017 Ukraine blocked access to Russian social media Vkontakte as a result lobbying by Facebook.

Disproof

No evidence given to support this allegation. Ukraine blocked access to Vkontakte and other Russian social media for security reasons, as part of a broader set of measures by the National Security Council (NSDC) to expand “personal economic and other restrictive measures (sanctions)” against personalities linked to the Crimean annexation, terrorist activities, illegal border crossing, and 468 Russia-based or Russia-affiliated companies. According to the Secretary of the National Security Council (NSDC) Olexandr Turchynov, such measures were taken as Russian Internet resources “threaten information and cyber security of Ukraine” and “are used for propaganda and the recruitment of agents by Russian security services.”