Disinfo: EU wants to create its own army to defend against the US


In the European Union, they thought about creating their own unified army to confront the United States. The EU feels threatened by the Americans, says the report of the European Court of Auditors and the EU’s own army will be designed to protect it from all directions, especially the USA.


Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the possible European armyIn the report of the European Court of Auditors, cited by the Russian media, there is not a single mention that the European Union, through the creation of the unified army, is allegedly preparing to defend itself from the United States. Instead, the first paragraph emphasises that the impetus for the development of defence in the EU was given by Russian aggression against Ukraine. It stipulates that the annexation of Crimea by Russia, the development of transatlantic relations, the strengthening and diversification of security threats and the return of competition between leading states have given a new impetus to EU defence cooperation.

Moreover, the report emphasises that before the start of Russian aggression in Ukraine, the collective defence spending of the EU member states was declining from year to year, and the trend towards an increase in spending appeared only relatively recently. For the next six years, the period from 2021 to 2027, the European Commission proposes to increase funding for foreign policy and defence initiatives to 22.5 billion euros. For comparison, from 2014 to 2020, the amount was 2.8 billion euros.

Read more fakes about the Europe army myth here and US presence in Europe here.


  • Reported in: Issue 166
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 13/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: US
  • Keywords: European army, EU, War preparation


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

MH-17: Russia gave evidence to Joint investigation team but it was ignored

The Dutch-led JIT’s investigation alleges that the Boeing was shot down by a Buk anti-aircraft system belonging to Kursk’s 53rd Russian anti-aircraft brigade. The Russian authorities not only provided radar data to the Netherlands, but also documentation that the Buk missile that hit the Boeing belonged to Ukraine, but the information was ignored by the investigators.


The report advances recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the MH17 crash.

The "evidence" claimed by Russia, namely radar data and the documentation on Buk's engine identified origin are only a small sample of misleading claims advanced by Moscow since 2015, some of which have contradicted one another.  Also this disinformation article refers both to a Russian radar which did not detect any Buk missile and at the same time, to the claim that the Buk was of "Ukrainian origin" (evidence advanced by Russia which Novaya Gazeta found to be fabricated).

The European Parliament carries out a political hatchet job for Poland

The European Parliament has carried out a political hatchet job for Poland. On 13 October Poland is holding parliamentary elections, and most experts connect the signing of the European Parliament’s resolution with the “Acute Autumn Symptom” of the Polish delegation to the EP. The current political leadership in Poland aims to demonstrate to the voters that they are defending the “historical boundaries” and fending off Russia.


Poland is a frequent target of pro-Kremlin propaganda, which portrays Poland as anti-Russian and aggressive toward Russia. This is an example of a recurring Pro-Kremlin narrative based on "Russophobia" myth. Similar cases can be found here and here.

On 18 September, the European Parliament adopted a resolution, describing the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 23 August 1939 as a key element, causing World War 2:

The EP allows the destruction of monuments to the fighters against Fascism

How could the members of the European Parliament sign a resolution, allowing the destruction of memorials, honouring the Soviet soldiers-liberators? The resolution is signed, it is not very surprising. The only way of preserving the memory of the fallen soldiers is to bring all the monuments to Russian territory, to stop the “barbarians” from desecrating the memories of generations.

Reading this opus, one cannot avoid remembering the Anti-Comintern pact that served as the foundation for the Berlin – Rome – Tokyo axis. The signing “democrats” of the European Parlament are, by the way, undeterred by this analogy.



Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the EU and Russophobia.

Contrary to the disinforming articles, the EP resolution acknowledges the context of the presence of monuments, glorifying totalitarian regimes: