Disinfo: Facebook has hired Ukrainian Right Sector supporters as chief censors for its Russian language segment


There is full-scale political and ideological censorship there (in the EU). For its Russian language segment, Facebook has hired Ukrainian Right Sector supporters as chief censors. No wonder Nazi texts stay (online) but posts about the Holocaust get censored. Very much like the OPCW statement which speaks of an unknown substance but attributes it to Russia and claims [Navalny] was poisoned in Russia.


A mixture of false claims presented without any evidence.

Facebook has not hired "Ukrainian Right Sector supporters". In certain countries and regions, Facebook works with third-party fact-checkers who are certified through the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network to help identify and review false information.

For example, in Ukraine, StopFake and VoxCheck help Facebook to identify fake news. So far, Facebook said that, based on the work of independent fact-checking organisations, it has labelled 40 million Facebook posts with warnings that the content may be false.

For background of legitimate criticism towards fact-checkers, see for example here.

Read a similar case: "Disinfo: Facebook uses Ukrainian Nazis to fight Russian presence".

According to the Data of press freedom ranking 2020 most of the EU countries have the best press freedom index score.


  • Reported in: Issue 215
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: EU, Russia, Ukraine
  • Keywords: Ukraine, social media, OPCW, Holocaust, Facebook, Alexei Navalny, Censorship, Freedom of speech, Russophobia, Right Sector, Nazi/Fascist


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

The Polish Presidential elections were totally falsified

Poland states that Belarus had “unjust elections”, which ended with 80% [support for Lukashenka]. In Poland, Andrzej Duda won the elections with 50.5%. At the present moment, everyone states that it was a total falsification.


An unfounded claim about Poland and the recent Presidential elections.

According to the statement of the OSCE observation mission to Poland, the 2020 Presidential elections in this country were “competitive and well-organised”. The Parliamentary Assembly’s election assessment mission also did not doubt in the free and democratic character of the Polish elections. The results of all Polish elections are internationally recognised and there is no evidence of any substantial violations of the principles of free and democratic elections in Poland.

Thousands of Belgian medics demand to stop the COVID-19 hysteria

Belgian scientists and doctors wrote an open letter to the government, asking to stop the COVID-19 hysteria.

The Belgian doctors asked their government to investigate the role of the WHO in causing the “infodemic” – informational epidemics.


Conspiracy theory based on recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about COVID-19.

The alleged letter of the Belgian doctors was published on the ru-an.info website, and later reprinted in Lithuanian sources. Neither of the outlets provide an original link to the alleged letter.

OPCW confirmed the absence of a toxic substance in Navalny’s samples

[The creator of Novichok chemical agent] Leonid Rink, in his interview to Dmitry Kiselyov confirmed that OPCW did not find in Navalny’s body traces of a toxic substance. The main evidence is that no phosphorus fragment was identified in Navalny’s samples. Basically, OPCW found traces of something unknown. The fragment that was identified could even refer to a detergent.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.

OPCW's report has been misrepresented. OPCW does not directly name Novichok in its conclusions published on the website on 6 October. However, point 5 of the summary mentions that biomarkers found in Navalny's samples "have similar structural characteristics to the toxic chemicals belonging to schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15".