Disinfo: For the West, Russia is an enemy that must be surrounded with military bases


Another reason for the growth of neo-Nazi sentiments is a kind of politics of “historical memory” in the young states of Europe that originated from the USSR. The ruling elites of these countries are building their own version of national history – the opposite to the one introduced into public consciousness during the Soviet period. As a result, often along with the restoration of historical justice, either open accomplices of Hitler’s National Socialism or radical nationalists not directly connected with the Nazi regime in Germany, become national heroes.

Besides objective reasons, subjective reasons also contribute to the growth of neo-Nazi and nationalist sentiments in Europe and America. For the collective West, Russia is an enemy that must be surrounded on all sides with military bases and must be imposed with sanctions. For this, even the falsification of history is enough.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about historical revisionism and Western belligerence towards Russia. There is no evidence that the West sees Russia as an enemy.

The Kremlin’s policy of historical revisionism accuses the West and particular EU members such as the Baltic states and Poland of the “falsification and re-writing” of WWII history. European states are continuously accused of their support for the Nazi or Fascist ideology. Any disagreement with the Kremlin's official view on the history of WWII is automatically labelled by Russia as support for “Nazism” or “falsification of history”.

While aware of pro-Kremlin disinformation campaigns, the West is trying to keep open channels of communications and cooperation with Russia. For instance, NATO as the Western organisation created cooperation bodies – the Permanent Joint Council and the NATO-Russia Council – to embody its relationship with Russia. It also invited Russia to cooperate on missile defence. The Warsaw Summit Communique 2016 describes NATO's official policy towards Russia: "The Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia. But we cannot, and will not, compromise on the principles on which our Alliance and security in Europe and North America rest." No other country outside the alliance has such a privileged relationship with NATO. NATO is not encircling Russia. Russia's land border is just over 20,000 kilometres long. Of that, less than one-sixteenth (1,215 kilometres), is shared with NATO members. Russia has land borders with 14 countries. Only five of them are NATO members.

Also, NATO enlargement is not directed against Russia. Every sovereign nation has the right to choose its own security arrangements. This is a fundamental principle of European security, one that Russia has also subscribed to and should respect. NATO enlargement has brought more stability and prosperity to Europe, including Russia.

The EU and its member states have maintained a clear policy of reaching out to Russian society and youth, mainly through the Erasmus+ student exchange programme and other people to people contacts, in line with five guiding principles of relations with Russia.

For background, see EUvsDisinfo analysis "The “Russophobia” Myth: Appealing to the Lowest Feelings" here.


  • Reported in: Issue 224
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07/12/2020
  • Language/target audience: German
  • Country: Russia
  • Keywords: Eastern Europe, Military, Encircling Russia, USSR, Historical revisionism, Nazi/Fascist


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Ukraine is facing a second Donbas in Transcarpathia

Ukraine will have to fight another civil war if Kyiv decides to deploy troops in Transcarpathia.


A recurring narrative about Ukrainian-Hungarian relations promoted by pro-Kremlin disinformation actors.

Ukrainian officials and authorities never indicated or attempted to introduce any form of tighter military rule or martial law specifically over Transcarpathia. In addition, the Hungarian ethnic community's representatives are not in any way advocating for breaking away with Ukraine. The latter is a Kremlin-pushed narrative to increase social tensions in Ukraine.

Ukrainian lab to produce Sputnik V vaccine

The Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and the Gamaleya Centre are poised to manufacture the Sputnik V vaccine in Ukraine.

The Ukrainian pharmaceutical company Biolik has already arranged for the production of the vaccine.


The story advances a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative flaunting the supposed superiority of the Russian-made coronavirus vaccine.

The claim was promptly debunked by the laboratory itself. On the day of RDIF's announcement, Biolik management issued a statement saying that the company "signed no contracts, received no technology transfers concerning the production of the Sputnik V vaccine," stressing that it conducts manufacturing operations "in accordance with Ukrainian laws currently in force" and "only in case of its [drug's] registration by the state."

The West wants to discredit Sputnik V vaccine

West appointed money for the campaign to discredit Russian vaccine Sputnik V. This decision is linked to NATO efforts to detain Russia. The vaccine will be discredited using “pseudo analytical researches” and fake testimonials about the assumed danger of the use of the vaccine. The creation of the vaccine is part of national policy and security. Western efforts to discredit Sputnik V is linked to the complex fight by NATO states, and especially the US, against Russia.


The messages in the articles are a part of a disinformation campaign aiming to promote the Russian Sputnik V vaccine and discredit Western vaccines, launched after approval of the Sputnik V vaccine was met with scepticism and criticism, even by Russian specialists in the country.

It is not true that Western media conduct campaigns to discredit Russian vaccines.