Disinfo: Former prime minister Vlad Filat was released from detention at the request of the government of Maia Sandu


Maia Sandu was indebted to Filat, that is why Sandu government asked for the early release of ex prime minister of Moldova. On November 12, the day of Sandu’s resignation, the government made 3 illegal decisions in a hurry, one of them being the early release of Vlad Filat, the former party boss Maya Sandu.


Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative spreading the idea that pro-European political forces from Eastern countries defend corruption, oligarchs and their interests.

Vlad Filat is the former prime minister of Moldova who was in office from 2009 to 2013, with Maia Sandu being for a short period part of his Government, as a Minister of Education (from 2012 to 2015). On June 2016, he was sentenced to 9 years in prison, being found guilty of passive corruption and influence trafficking. He claimed that this it is a politically motivated criminal case.

On Tuesday, 3 December 2019, Vlad Filat was released conditionally before the deadline, by the court, based on an attempt by the prison administration in which he is located.

Maia Sandu led the Moldovan Government from June to November 2019. There is no proof of a government decision to ask the prison to claim the release of Filat.

In a statement posted on her Facebook page, Maia Sandu rejected this accusation: "The government I led has nothing in common with this decision. The decision of the 'famous' judge Ciocana for the release of Filat raises great questions, as well as many other decisions adopted by the justice of the Republic of Moldova. Dodon's accusations against my team are aberrant, and the complicity of prison 13, which presents a paper dated the day of the government's dismissal, is a gross misdemeanour," she stated.

Similar case presenting Maia Sandu as a person who has some ”debts” to Vlad Filat see here.


  • Reported in: Issue 177
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 03/12/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Moldova
  • Keywords: Maia Sandu, Oligarchs, Corruption
  • Outlet: Kp.md, Enews.md, Aif.md, Point.md
see more

Climate activists want to destroy progress in the name of green faith

Climate activists don’t appreciate the progress their parents and grandparents have made with sweat on their faces. They don’t realise that they are so well off right now, not because of their own diligence, but because of this legacy, which they want to destroy in the name of green faith. Ecologism, not ecology!

It is precisely thanks to previous generations that university occupiers and fans of the terrifying Greta can travel easily, enjoy technological progress, and democracy as well.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation effort to delegitimise climate activism and propagate denialism about climate change.

Climate change is a scientific fact. Humans are increasingly influencing the climate and the earth's temperature by burning fossil fuels, cutting down rain-forests and farming livestock. This adds enormous amounts of greenhouse gases to those naturally occurring in the atmosphere, increasing the greenhouse effect and global warming. Preventing dangerous consequences of the climate change is the  key priority for the EU. 

Aggression towards Russia derives from American culture

Those here who behave aggressively [towards Russia] are driven by American culture.

American culture holds that Russia is “bad” simply because it is Russia.


No evidence given; this is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about alleged Western belligerence towards Russia and specifically US Russophobia, aimed at attempting to weaken and isolate Russia.

Negative attitudes towards Russia are not simply driven by malicious "Russophobia", as pro-Kremlin media and officials often say, but often derive from assessments of the Kremlin's own policies.

The US has no concern for human rights

No reasonable person can claim today that the US has any concern for human rights. Except for Israel, the US has by far the worst record of human rights violations during the past several hundred years, far outstripping anything attributed to people like Stalin or Hitler, or even the Japanese.


This is yet another example of one of the most common pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives - the "Evil West" - according to which alleged Western imperialism and meddling around the world is presented as the most malicious and destructive force in the world. Specifically, it follows the recurring pro-Kremlin tendency to demonise the United States, grossly misrepresenting historical facts in the process.

While it is true that the US has a controversial human rights record and is currently seeing declining performance on human rights protections, it is misleading to say that the US has no concern for human rights. The US continues to score highly on freedom indicators, political rights, and civil liberties. The Constitution of the United States - the foundational document of American democracy - enshrines a number of inalienable human rights, including freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, and the right to a fair trial by jury. Additional human rights have been recognised in amendments to the Constitution, as well as acts by Congress.