French media are not free

Summary

Russia bashing takes place in the French press. It has evolved a lot since the 70s and 80s when France’s media was pluralistic and discussions between different political figures took place. This is not the case nowadays. Take a random newspaper. Le Monde, for example: It is the Pravda of today. Its coverage of Russia is even worse than Pravda. Every media outlet reports the same. The question is, how has France reached this point?

In Russia, freedom of speech exists but in our own way.

In France, you can only say one thing about Russia, like aggression and that Putin is a dictator. This is freedom to say only one narrative. Let’s take coverage of Ukraine in France. It’s almost like one centre exists which indicates what to write: a democratic country is struggling against Russian aggression. Only a few media outlets mention that there are far right, Nazi forces in Ukraine which march like the Nazis in Germany in the 30s.

Disproof

No evidence given.

According to Reporters without borders, France ranks 32nd for freedom of speech among 180 countries, the same as for 2019. Russia is at 149, behind, for example, the United Arab Emirates. Its ranking means that the Russian press is not free “in its own way” as specified.

French media, meanwhile, are happy to broadcast a range of viewpoints. For example, Vladimir Putin's 4 hour long interview was broadcast during prime time on a French public TV channel. A movie on "Nazis in Ukraine" ("Masks of the revolution") was broadcast on the private channel Canal+, although it provoked criticism from other journalists working in the region.

Pro-Kremlin narrative states that Ukraine’s ruling bodies contain Nazis and that the annexation of Crimea was "preventive" to avoid any future Nazi victims. But first of all, the far right is not influential in Ukrainian politics. There are no Nazis in the government nor in the parliament of Ukraine. The insignificance of the "Right Sector" is evident from the election results – their candidate received 0.7% of the vote in the May 2014 presidential elections, and the party received 1.8% of the vote in the October 2014 parliamentary elections. It is far short of the threshold needed to enter Parliament. The "Right Sector" supported Svoboda's candidate, Ruslan Kushuyinskyi, in the April 2019 presidential election. Mr. Kurshuyinskyi received 1,62 percents of the votes in the first round of the election.

Currently, only 7 out of 450 deputies in the Ukrainian parliament Verkhovna Rada represent the so-called right-wing: 6 deputies from the "Svoboda" party and one from the "Right Sector". Therefore, they do not have any significant influence on decision making neither in Ukrainian parliament nor in government.

 

publication/media

View original (07:42 09:28, 20:00, 22:45)
Below is the link to the RT France Youtube channel. ttps://web.archive.org/web/20190422102449/View archived
  • Reported in: Issue 146
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 17/04/2019
  • Language/target audience: , , French
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine, France
  • Keywords: Freedom of speech, Nazi/Fascist
  • Outlet: RT French
see more

Facebook is a project of the Soros Foundation, financed by National Security Agency

Facebook is a project of the Soros Foundation, which is financed by the National Security Agency. Hence, Facebook’s global objective is to collect personal data for the purpose of the American security service.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin conspiracy about the US and social media. The claims are ungrounded. After the leaks by NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA collected data from Facebook users, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckeberg expressed his disapproval of the NSA’s actions and said that he had spoken to then president Barack Obama by phone to “express [his] frustration over the damage the government is creating for all of our futures.”

See earlier disinformation messages alleging excessive control over Facebook by American security bodies here and here.

Russia fully respects international law, in Crimea and elsewhere

Russia fully respects the norms of international law. If there are some who feel offended, Russia has nothing to beg pardon for. Russia does everything that meets the norms of international law and the United Nations Charter. Russia respects the right of peoples to self-determination, including that of ethnic minorities, whether in Crimea or another regions. Sanctions will be ineffective in putting pressure on both Russia and other countries that respect their history and identity.

Disproof

According to international law, Crimea is part of Ukraine. Russia violated international law, as well as the key principles of the European security framework, by illegally annexing the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol.

On March 27th, 2014, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution in which it stated that the referendum in Crimea was not valid and could not serve as a basis for any change in the status of the peninsula. Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia, recognised on April 17th, 2015 that "our soldiers were deployed in Crimea to help the inhabitants express their opinion".

Germany is a vassal of the US

Germany is a vassal of the US. The USA gives Germany direct commands.  It reflects the basically colonial system of the geopolitical chain of vassals and overlords that exists in the world.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about German-American relations.

Germany is an independent and sovereign country and is not dependent on the United States of America in terms of foreign policy making and therefore it is a conspiracy theory presented without any evidence.  Germany and the US have close partner relations of two sovereign and independent countries.