Disinfo: Germany, France and Ukraine admitted that they need a war in Donbas


Germany, France and Ukraine admitted that they need a war in Donbas

The delegations of Germany, France, and Ukraine did not participate in the event at the UN, where representatives of the DNR and LNR were present. This confirms that [Germany, France, and Ukraine] are not interested in the peace in Donbas.

Ukraine consistently refuses to start a dialogue and thus supports the active phase of the conflict in Donbas. The statements of Dmytro Kuleba, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, and the [Ukrainian] delegation in the Contact Group are an attempt to shut the mouths [of DNR, LNR representatives], to prevent the truth about the atrocities of Ukrainian nationalists from being heard in the UN. It is strict censorship.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Ukraine, the war in Ukraine and the Minsk agreements.

Ukraine, along with France, Germany, UK, US, Belgium, and Estonia (six current members of the United Nations Security Council) refused to join a Russia-hosted meeting on Ukraine.

In a joint statement, US, UK, and Estonian diplomats stated that the meeting "was a transparent attempt to present a false and misleading narrative regarding the conflict in eastern Ukraine" and that they "strongly reject Russia’s premise that it is acting as a mediator within an internal conflict."

Ukraine, Germany and France have constantly emphasised their commitment to implement the Minsk agreements. Ukraine is trying to avoid a legal vacuum in its national legislation regarding certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, demonstrating its commitment to implement the Minsk agreements. Ukraine also proposed to conduct local elections in Donbas in early spring on condition that the security situation is normalised.

See similar disinformation cases on the Minsk agreement alleging Ukraine does not show any interest in the Minsk agreements; that peace in Ukraine is not in the interests of Western government; that the "Normandy four meeting" was cancelled due to Ukraine's inability to keep its word; or that chairman of the Verkhovna Rada admitted that Kyiv will not implement the Minsk agreements.


  • Reported in: Issue 223
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 03/12/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine, Germany, France
  • Keywords: United Nations, Ukraine, DNR, Eastern Ukraine, LNR, War in Ukraine, Donbas, Minsk agreements


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Lithuania constantly interferes in the affairs of Belarus

Lithuania constantly interferes into the affairs of Belarus, supporting the opposition and calling for new elections in the neighbouring country. Lithuanian politicians think that the results of the presidential elections in Belarus were “falsified”. The Baltic countries implement personal sanctions against some Belarusian officials, including President Alexander Lukashenko.

Moscow has urged Lithuania many times not to destabilise the situation in the neighbouring country and allow people in Belarus to take matters in their own hands.

The Belarusian authorities have said many times that protests in the country are coordinated from abroad. Lukashenko accuses Western countries of direct interference in the situation in the republic. The US is the main coordinator and Europeans are supporters of the riots in Belarus.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Lithuania and alleged Western attempts to organise a colour revolution in Belarus.

Lithuania is a neighbour of Belarus and it continues to support the Belarusian people. This support has included the possibility for Belarusians to arrive in Lithuania under the so-called humanitarian exception, the possibility for students from Belarus to begin studies in Lithuania etc.

Western values eventually eliminate nations

The introduction of recent, postmodern Western values ​​in Georgia will lead to the devaluation of national values ​​and, consequently, the liquidation of the Georgian nation.

The campaign to discredit the Orthodox religion and the legalisation of same sex marriage are two events whose introduction into Georgian society will lead to the complete devaluation of the main identifying characteristic of the Georgian nation – the Orthodox religion. This process will automatically lead to the disintegration of the united Georgian nation into easily manipulated individuals, which will inevitably end with the liquidation of the nation’s historical-cultural unity.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative aimed at portraying the West and the Western values as pernicious, immoral, degenerate and a threat to traditional values. The narrative about “threatened values”, one of the most common pro-Kremlin narratives, suggests that those who are committed to traditional values are now threatened by those who oppose them and instead seek to establish a morally bankrupt dystopia.

These narratives aim at portraying the West as depraved and endangering societies by imposing the same beliefs on other countries. It undermines progressive Western attitudes about a variety of normative issues, including the rights of women, ethnic and religious minorities, and LGBTQ groups, among others.

EU sanctions on “Russian disinformation” aim to strangle democratic debate

The EU’s proposed sanctions on what they call Russian/Chinese “disinformation” seek to strangle the democratic debate, not protect it. Years of the ‘Russiagate’ hysteria fueled by the Atlantic establishment have reached their logical end point, with unelected bureaucrats in Brussels reportedly seeking to sanction “disinformation” in the name of protecting democracy. The field of “countering Kremlin disinformation” has been an incredibly lucrative cottage industry within NATO since the 2014 US-backed coup in Ukraine and the resulting hysteria over “Russian aggression.” After the 2016 US elections and the finally debunked “Russiagate” conspiracy theory, again to no avail, funding skyrocketed. All of this is being done in the name of protecting the “democratic debate,” of course. irony of ironies, by prohibiting anything that deviates beyond the shrinking perimeter of discourse defined by established powers.


This is a mix of several recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives, aiming to deny any wrongdoing by Russia by accusing those attempting to counter its disinformation of “limiting freedom of expression” or pursuing their own economic interests. No evidence is provided to support any of the multiple affirmations.

Contrary to these claims, Russia’s interference campaigns in Europe and the US through disinformation and other means have been widely proven and documented. Russia’s meddling in the US election in 2016 is not a “debunked conspiracy theory”; instead, a huge set of evidence was gathered and made public by special counsel Robert Mueller and by a 5-volume series of reports by the Intelligence Committee of the US Senate. Similar inquiries have been carried out and served to document Russian efforts to interfere in UK, France and Germany, among other countries. The European Democracy Action Plan proposes improving the existing EU's toolbox for countering this foreign interference, including new instruments that allow imposing costs on perpetrators.