Global neo-colonialists stage colour revolutions and conquer indigenous national elites

Summary

National governments around the world risk becoming subservient to global elites. The latter pursue egoistic interests with the aim to expand their resource base and to increase their power. Together with economic globalisation, corporations have increased their information expansion in the cultural space. Some call it a global civil war between the globalising elites and ‘indigenous people’s masses’.

[…] here we talk about a secondary colonisation of those nations where the governments do not have sufficient technologies and resources to withstand the pressure from the globalists. The decision power of the national elites of subordinated countries is removed. The tools of neo-colonialists include:

– Imposing ideological narratives beneficial to colonisers and incomprehensible to national elites (e.g., liberalism, social-democracy, market, civil society, sustainable development, etc.);

– Controlling the information channels, influencing the indigenous peoples;

– Legitimating political regimes of the conquered countries through so called colour revolutions;

– Control over human resource policies of indigenous elites.

Disproof

This message is in line with the concept of big conspiracy and is consistent with the Shadow Government narrative. It is also aimed at discrediting a number of democratic and liberal concepts such as civil society and market economy, and to question the legitimacy of Ukrainian state institutions. Above all, this message is in line with the narrative of lost sovereignty, in this case as a result of alleged purposeful actions by global elites.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 152
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07/05/2019
  • Language/target audience: Belarus
  • Country: The West
  • Keywords: Secret elites / global elites, Colour revolutions, Conspiracy
  • Outlet: Imhoclub
see more

International think-tanks including the Chatham House elaborate plans to disrupt Belarus-Russia relations

International think-tanks including the Chatham House elaborate plans to disrupt Belarus-Russia relations

One probable future scenario envisages the Eastern European region in the 21st century as the main bone of contention between the key global actors. Given this, the allied relations between Belarus and Russia can become an important factor for stabilisation in Eastern Europe. For this reason, a number of international think-tanks, which have no interest in a stable Eastern Europe, elaborate plans to disrupt integration between the two countries. These plans envisage the following:

  • The change of domestic and foreign policies of Belarus, its turn in foreign policy towards the West;
  • Inadequate response by Russia which will start counteracting Western influence along the Ukrainian scenario by forceful means;
  • Formation of a broad anti-Russian coalition of Eastern European countries, followed by the displacement of the Russian presence in Eastern Europe;
  • Increasing chaos and conflicting relations stemming from the confrontation with Russia;
  • Using the chaos in Eastern Europe as a tool to disrupt trade relations between China and Western Europe or taking them under US control.

One example is the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). In November 2018, it published a report about three Eastern European countries (Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine) where Belarus-Russia relations were given significant attention.

Disproof

This is a conspiracy consistent with repetitive pro-Kremlin narratives about the West's attempts to disrupt Belarusian-Russian relations, to destabilise Belarus through a colour revolution or otherwise, and the West's far-fetching anti-Russian activities.

The mentioned Chatham House report analyses ways to increase societal resilience in Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova in response to threats emanating from Russia, which deploys a set of tools aimed at weakening their sovereignty.

The US is sending a hospital ship to the Caribbean as preparation for an intervention in Venezuela

The decision to send US Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort to the Caribbean is part of the preparations for a military intervention in Venezuela against the government of Nicolas Maduro.

Disproof

There is no evidence to support the claim that this is part of a wider deployment for a military intervention even if the decision to send the hospital ship near Venezuela has been criticised for alleged contributing to a rise in tensions.

The USNS Comfort carries no weapons, has a clearly defined status as a non-combatant vessel and its crew are mostly composed of navy specialists in non-fighting roles and civilians. Similar allegations were made when the same ship was sent to the Colombian coast to treat Venezuelan refugees last November.

The EU is a neocolonial project

The EU is an undemocratic neocolonial project.

We think that the undemocratic project of the European Union (EU) is losing its legitimacy. (…) The resistance of oppressed countries held in neocolonial status is often called “nationalism” by the oppressors to discredit this resistance.

The EU is a construction of banks and corporations that secures their domination and profits. (…) Protests against it are suppressed by the comprehensive dismantling of democratic rights as well as new instruments of surveillance and repression.

 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the undemocratic EU and on the failed European values.

The EU is not neocolonial, but a democratic Union of 28 Member States.  The unique feature of the EU is that, although the Member States all remain sovereign and independent states, they have decided to pool some of their 'sovereignty' in areas where it makes sense to work together.