DISINFO: Hague court sides with Russia on Crimea's legal status
DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS
  • Outlet: sputniknews.com (archived)*
  • Date of publication: February 22, 2020
  • Outlet language(s): English
  • Reported in: Issue 186
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine, Russia
Tags:
Azov sea Kerch illegal annexation Sovereignty International Law Crimea

DISINFO: Hague court sides with Russia on Crimea's legal status

SUMMARY

The decision by the Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration takes into consideration that Ukraine’s maritime lawsuit against Russia is an attempt to prove Kyiv’s nonexistent sovereignty over the Crimean Peninsula.

The Russian Federation is satisfied [by the fact] that the adopted decision takes into account Russia’s key argument that there is an attempt to prove Ukraine’s nonexistent sovereignty over Crimea behind this lawsuit.

RESPONSE

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Crimea.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) could not and did not support Russia's "argument" regarding Crimea or, for that matter, any other argument concerning dry land. Given that the case was commenced under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, any disputes over land territory will automatically fall outside the scope of these proceedings, as confirmed by an earlier PCA ruling (p. 1, para 5).

In a statement to the Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Ministry, the Court refrained from adopting a stance on the legal status of Crimea, "given that it lacks the jurisdiction to rule on issues of sovereignty over the peninsula." The statement also "makes clear that the [Court's] recognition of the existence of a dispute regarding the territorial status of Crimea in no way implies the [Court's] recognition of any changes to that status."

Embed

Related disinfo cases

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Your opinion matters!

    Data Protection Information *

      Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

      Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

      Data Protection Information *

      The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.