Disinfo: Hague court sides with Russia on Crimea’s legal status

Summary

The decision by the Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration takes into consideration that Ukraine’s maritime lawsuit against Russia is an attempt to prove Kyiv’s nonexistent sovereignty over the Crimean Peninsula.

The Russian Federation is satisfied [by the fact] that the adopted decision takes into account Russia’s key argument that there is an attempt to prove Ukraine’s nonexistent sovereignty over Crimea behind this lawsuit.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Crimea.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) could not and did not support Russia's "argument" regarding Crimea or, for that matter, any other argument concerning dry land. Given that the case was commenced under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, any disputes over land territory will automatically fall outside the scope of these proceedings, as confirmed by an earlier PCA ruling (p. 1, para 5).

In a statement to the Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Ministry, the Court refrained from adopting a stance on the legal status of Crimea, "given that it lacks the jurisdiction to rule on issues of sovereignty over the peninsula." The statement also "makes clear that the [Court's] recognition of the existence of a dispute regarding the territorial status of Crimea in no way implies the [Court's] recognition of any changes to that status."

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 186
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 22/02/2020
  • Language/target audience: English
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine
  • Keywords: Azov sea, Kerch, illegal annexation, International Law, Sovereignty, Crimea
  • Outlet: Sputnik News
see more

Russian collusion hoax pushed to excuse for Clinton’s loss, election fraud

Russia did not interfere in the US political system. Allegations of collusion were made up to excuse the election loss of Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, as well as to deflect public attention from instances of election fraud and corruption.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative denying Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.

Before the Mueller report was published, Russian meddling in the 2016 election had already been established by US intelligence agencies. Thus, the Special Investigation was primarily concerned with "whether any Americans […] joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election" (p.2).

US military might have released the coronavirus to challenge China

Experiments with the most dangerous viruses have been carried out in Wuhan’s Institute of Virology.

According to one version, someone has intentionally staged a provocation, releasing the virus into the natural environment. Experts suggest that the US military could have done so, in order to take revenge on the Chinese for building their own laboratory.

Disproof

No evidence given. A recurring pro-Kremlin narrative that the US military is behind the spread of the coronavirus.

The current coronavirus (2019-nCoV) comes from a family of viruses that include other viruses such as SARS and MERS. It was first reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan in central China and has been rapidly spreading with new cases being reported in the Asian-Pacific region as well as Europe, North America and the Middle East.

The Soros network is a derivative of the CIA and the US State Department

Agenda of the Soros network is a part of the American expansionist policy. The army of Soros accompanies, prepares and ensures the ideological assistance to America’s aggressive interventionist policy. This is exactly why the Soros galaxy is a derivative of the CIA and the US State Department.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin conspiracy about George Soros.

The Open Society Foundation supports independent groups working for justice, democratic governance, and human rights worldwide. There is no evidence to confirm that it is connected to the CIA.