NYT says Crimea is Russian

Summary

The New York Times has published a map of Ukraine on which Crimea is in the colours of Russia. While Kiev is unhappy, the publication of this map by the US newspaper clearly shows that everyone is tired of the rhetoric about the alleged “annexation” of the peninsula by Moscow. It is high time that Ukrainian politicians understood that it is impossible to always repeat the same old narrative on the “annexation of Crimea”. This is the past of the old Ukrainian criminal regime. Crimea, annexed to Ukraine by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in 1954, returned to Russia following a referendum in March 2014 following a coup in Kiev.

Kiev should adopt a more constructive approach, respect the choice of the inhabitants of the Crimean peninsula and restore peace in Donbas.

Disproof

The NYT did publish such a map but corrected it (the day before the Sputnik article was published): "Correction: Nov. 6, 2019. An earlier version of this article included a map of Ukraine suggesting that it was separate from Crimea. The map should have indicated the area, annexed by Russia in 2014, with a dashed borderline." The correction of the mistake by NYT was never reflected by Sputnik.

The disinformation narrative about the annexation of Crimea by Russia and its progressive recognition in the world is recurrent. No international body recognises the so-called referendum, announced on 27 February 2014, and held on 16 March 2014 amid the presence of Russian troops. The UNGA adopted the resolution 68/262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. For the EU statement on the fifth anniversary of Crimea's annexation, see here.

The borders of Ukraine, including Crimea, were recognized and guaranteed after its independence in 1991 by international agreements, some of which were signed by Russia itself. Read the debunk of the historical disinformation narrative "Crimea has been always Russian" (given accidentally to Ukraine in 1954).

As for "Kyiv should adopt a more constructive approach, respect the choice of the inhabitants of the Crimean peninsula and restore peace in Donbas", it is hardly dependable on Ukraine alone. The war in eastern Ukraine is not a civil conflict but a well-documented act of aggression by Russian armed forces, ongoing since February 2014

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 174
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 07/11/2019
  • Language/target audience: French
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine
  • Keywords: Crimea
  • Outlet: Sputnik French
see more

Maia Sandu is a protege of the USA and is supervised by the CIA

Maya Sandu’s actions can be driven not only by her own ambitions. Someone might have simply given her a specific task, for example, provoke another domestic political crisis in the country, or maybe a coup in order to remove the socialists and the president of the republic from power. It’s not a secret for anyone who Maya Grigoryevna is, that she is the so-called protege of the West, and specifically the USA and, naturally, is supervised by the CIA.

Disproof

No evidence given. A recurring pro-Kremlin narrative that governments in many post-Soviet countries are under US control, receiving and executing orders from American state institutions. See a similar case claiming that the US controls everything in Moldova.

After meeting with U.S. Under Secretary of State, David Hale, on 13 July 2019, Maia Sandu said that the United States of America "has been and remains a strategic partner of Moldova in its efforts to become a free and democratic country." On 12 November 2019, the day of the Maia Sandu government resignation, US Embassy stated that the dismissal is unfortunate, but urged "elected representatives of the Moldovan people to build a more just, democratic, and prosperous future for all its citizens".

The concept of “energy security” has turned into an anti-Russian project

Poland and the United States have put considerable effort into promoting the idea that the Nord Stream 2 challenges EU security. For this purpose, the concept of “energy security” was established. Initially, this concept implied diversification of energy sources, but gradually, it has turned into a clear anti-Russian project. There has been a return to a “Cold War” approach, which assumed that it is not necessary to buy anything from Russia at all. This approach does not imply a diversification of energy sources (purchase of oil and gas from Russia and other suppliers), but on the contrary – to break contacts with Russia and search for other suppliers of energy sources.

Disproof

This case is part of the Kremlin's disinformation campaign about European energy policy and the US fight with the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

The European Energy Security Strategy is not aimed against Russia or any other supplier of energy sources. Thus, it does not include the complete rupture of energy cooperation with the Russian Federation. The EU Energy Security Strategy was released in May 2014 – it aims to ensure a stable and abundant supply of energy for European citizens and the economy. Regarding its long-term measures, it proposes actions based on eight key pillars, like protecting strategic infrastructure, moderating energy demand, building a well-functioning and fully integrated internal market, increasing energy production in the European Union, diversifying external supplies and related infrastructure and further developing energy technologies.

There was a Ukrainian provocation in the Kerch strait

Russian border guards seized the Ukrainian military ships during a provocation in the Kerch Strait on November 25, 2018.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation about the Kerch incident.

On the 25th of November 2018, border patrol boats belonging to Russia’s FSB security service seized two small Ukrainian armoured artillery vessels and a tug boat and their crews after shooting at them, wounding several Ukrainian servicemen and arresting 24 members.