Disinfo: In America today, freedom of speech can only be exercised in narrow and controlled channels


In America today, freedom of speech can only be exercised in narrow and controlled channels. It is permissible to use freedom of speech to demonise Donald Trump and his supporters as “enemies of democracy”, to demonise white people as “systemic racists” and “white supremacists,” and to demonise heterosexual white males as “misogynists.” The other permissible use of freedom of speech is to demonise countries, Russia, China, and Iran, that stand in the way of Washington’s hegemony. There are no other permissible uses of free speech today in the United States.


A common pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative that freedom of speech is being abolished and that a dictatorship is being established in America. Pro-Kremlin outlets have recently intensified this message as part of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign to discredit Joe Biden’s electoral victory.

It is not true, as the article claims, that, in the US, freedom of speech can be exercised only “in controlled channels” and to express particular political views, such as the demonisation of Donald Trump, of white people, of heterosexual males and of Russia, China and Iran.

According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing for limitations on certain categories of speech. Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and therefore may be restricted, include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising.

Read similar cases claiming that in the US censorship is similar to Nazi Germany’s censorship and that there is no freedom of speech in America because Rudolph Giuliani can speak out only on RT.


  • Reported in: Issue 230
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 20/01/2021
  • Outlet language(s) Italian, English
  • Country: US
  • Keywords: Freedom of speech, Donald Trump, Conspiracy theory
see more

Special forces detachment "Berkut" tried to protect Ukrainians 7 years ago

Seven years ago, armed clashes broke out in the centre of Kyiv when militant-nationalists from Western Ukraine were brought to Kyiv and the special forces, “Berkut”, tried to protect Ukrainians.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Euromaidan protests.

The Ukrainian revolution started from the gathering of students in Kyiv after former president Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the EU Association Agreement. They were not 'militant-nationalists' who were 'brought to Kyiv'. The memories of participants are well-documented and it shows that there were people from all over the country who participated by their own will. Far-right groups had a very limited presence during the protests.

Navalny is used as an instrument by the Western special services

Foreign states are behind all the actions of the opposition leader Alexei Navalny; there is no place for such people who “betrayed the country” in the Russian authorities.

Today, Navalny is used as an instrument (interference) by the Western special services, the State Department. Everyone should have an understanding that everything he does is backed by foreign states. Our task is to prevent foreign interference, whoever pursues policy here, the country must be protected.

And if a person has betrayed the country, if he is on foreign funding, there is nothing for him to do in any government bodies. You cannot help him engage in politics, represent our citizens in different government bodies.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Alexey Navalny.

Anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny has long been the most prominent face of Russian opposition to President Vladimir Putin. His candidacy in the 2018 presidential election was banned by authorities over his conviction by a Russian court of embezzlement, which bars him from running for office. He has been arrested and imprisoned several times during his political career.

Navalny's arrest could be used by the West to impose new anti-Russian sanctions

The arrest of opposition leader Alexey Navalny after his return to Moscow from Germany, where he was hospitalised after he fell ill in Omsk, Siberia, has provoked a new wave of reactions in the West against Russia. Many analysts believe that this is part of a strategy to impose new sanctions against Moscow.


A new twist of a previously used pro-Kremlin narrative that the poisoning of Alexei Navalny (and now his return to Russia) is a secret project to introduce sanctions on Russia.

Contrary to the claim, which is not backed by any evidence, Alexei Navalny is an independent Russian politician, not a pawn of any foreign government. His decision to return to Russia is related to his refusal to become an exile and to internal deliberations of his political movement, not to any order from abroad.