In case of ratification of Istanbul Convention an influx of 50,000 perverts from abroad is expected

Summary

Over fifty thousand signatures have already been collected in Armenia against ratification of the Istanbul Convention.

Istanbul Convention provides broad rights to transvestites, homosexuals, lesbians and other perverts in Armenia. Under Article 60, by ratifying the Convention, the country is obliged to grant asylum to persons who were persecuted on the basis of sexual orientation. In the case of ratification of the Istanbul Convention, a flow of perverts is expected.

There is internal information that the initial number for the Republic of Armenia is 50,000. Therefore, after ratifying the document we are obliged to provide asylum to 50,000 people.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on Istanbul Convention.

The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence is based on the understanding that violence against women is a form of gender-based violence that is committed against women because they are women. It is the obligation of the state to fully address it in all its forms and to take measures to prevent violence against women, protect its victims and prosecute the perpetrators.

The Convention opponents are manipulating with misinterpretation of definitions, presenting the gender-based violence as persecution on a basis of sexual orientation. Article 60 of the Convention is about gender-based asylum claims. According to Article 60 "Parties shall take the necessary legislative or other measures to ensure that gender-based violence against women may be recognised as a form of persecution within the meaning of Article 1, A (2), of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and as a form of serious harm giving rise to complementary/subsidiary protection."

The claim that Armenia is obliged to grant asylum to 50 000 people is unfounded.

More manipulations of the Istanbul Convention is available here. See similar cases claiming that the Istanbul Convention will destroy traditional families and that it is attacking identity and traditions.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 172
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 05/11/2019
  • Language/target audience: Armenian
  • Country: Armenia
  • Keywords: Conspiracy, LGBT
  • Outlet: livenews.am
see more

Western Media artificially distorted the history of World War II

Western Media artificially distorted the history of World War II. Biased publications in the Western media were aimed at distorting the essence of World War II. Even more, belittling Russia’s importance in achieving victory over fascism.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about WWII. No evidence of Western media manipulating WWII coverage.

The European Parliament called the war as the bloodiest tragedy of the century, which resulted in millions of victims of authoritarian regimes of fascist Germany and the USSR. The European Parliament has also expressed concern about the efforts of the current Russian leadership to whitewash the crimes committed by the Soviet totalitarian regime and see them as a dangerous component of the information war against democratic Europe.

Russia prevented genocide in Donbas

Russia is not an aggressor, but in fact, it was the only force that was able to stop the genocide of the population of [Donbas].

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the war in Ukraine and the claimed genocide of ethnic Russians in Ukraine.

Human rights missions that travelled to Ukraine in 2014 did not find evidence that the Russian minority would have been in danger. See, for instance, the Advisory Committee’s Ad hoc report on the situation of national minorities in Ukraine, adopted on 1 April 2014 by the Council of Europe; June 2014 report on the human rights situation in Ukraine by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; and statement by the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities on her Visit to Ukraine published on 4 April 2014.

Minsk agreements confirm there is a civil war in Ukraine

The Minsk agreements, which is truly the only document recognised by the entire international community, because it is endorsed at the level of the UN Security Council, says that this is an internal conflict in Ukraine. There is never a single word about Russia, only in the context that it is the guarantor of the implementation of the Minsk agreements.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative that targets the Minsk agreements and justifies Russia's involvement in the war in Ukraine.

The Minsk agreements (the 2014 memorandum and 2015 plan of action) is the roadmap to the stabilisation of the situation in the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk. It is true that both documents do not mention Russia as a side involved in the war, however, the documents do not mention the sides whatsoever. There is no clause in the Minsk agreements that defines the conflict as "internal". On the contrary, the Minsk agreements (paragraph 10) state clearly the need to withdraw “all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the monitoring of the OSCE.”