Europe and the West has embarked on the path of the brutal concept of Children’s Rights, and the state has received the right to intrude in family matters. This is very strange from the background of the liberal concept of freedom.
People say that the Soviet Union was a bad totalitarian state. But in the USSR families were never attacked as now in Europe or America under the pretext of children’s rights. To whom are those children handed over? In what families to they end up? What if they are given to paedophiles or other perverts.
An unfounded claim, consistent with a trope, suggesting that European governments have the rights to "steal children" from their families, and, potentially, handing them over to "perverts". Similar stories can be found here and here.
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child obliges national authorities to protect children from violence. This convention is signed and ratified by Russia and all EU Member States.
Studies conducted on Sputnik V showed that the vaccine was 91.6% effective.
In practice, the results were evaluated by the European Office of the World Health Organisation. On Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron allowed Sputnik V to be used in his country.
The claim that Emmanuel Macron has allowed the use of Sputnik V in France is a grave misreporting of his assertion that all vaccines, including Sputnik V, that are given approval by European and national health authorities will be welcome in France:
"The European authorities and our national authorities will take an independent scientific look at this vaccine and, depending on these results and the evidence, will decide whether or not to approve it," said the French president.
He added that the decision will be scientific and not political. To date, Sputnik V has not been approved for use in France.
Against this background, Europe’s coronavirus method of “isolating and not letting people go until everyone is vaccinated” seems ineffective. European authorities either do not want to change their policy or find no other way out. As a result, countries on this continent are almost trying to snatch the vaccine from each other.
And, of course, in this situation, it is necessary to stop the information war against the Russian vaccine. Just like Angela Merkel gave up her previous position and offered Vladimir Putin to support the Sputnik V vaccine in the Council of Europe.
This article is a part of a narrative claiming that European countries are “discriminating” the Russian Sputnik V vaccine. Such claims are false. On contrary, Russian and British scientists teamed up to trial a combination of the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Sputnik V vaccines to see if protection against Covid-19 can be improved.
All vaccines must be approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) to be sold in all EU countries, Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein. However, any EU country may buy Sputnik V separately, as Hungary did, but it is not allowed to sell it to EU countries without EMA’s approval.
The German special services probably helped Alexei Navalny when filming a film about the “palace in Gelendzhik”. It is clear that getting into this building and even more so getting access to some archives is impossible without cooperation with the official authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany – most likely with their special services.
Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Alexei Navalny.
The German Stasi's archives, used in Alexei Navalny's investigative video on Vladimir Putin, Sergey Chemezov and Nikolay Tokarev are open and have been used by researchers in the past.
