Disinfo: In the summer of 1941 Britain deliberately did not rush to help the USSR

Summary

Britain in the summer of 1941 was deliberately in no hurry to provide military assistance to the Soviet Union after its entry into the war with Germany, and London did not intend to transfer to Moscow the technical information that it possessed itself. This is proven by the declassified archival materials of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).

Disproof

A recurring deceptive narrative on WWII that tries to diminish or deny the role of the Western Allies and the financial and material support to the Soviet Union.

The Russian publication The Insider classified this story as 'half-truth'. The document taken from the archives and published by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service is authentic but taken out of the context, suggests that the attacks perpetrated by the Third Reich against allies convoys were not a real threat and understate the support provided by the UK.

The document published by the SVR relates to a specific tactical situation when the allies were deciding on the least dangerous route for the supply of military supplies to the Soviet Union. There were fears that the German navy and aviation would be able to block the route from Iceland to Arkhangelsk. In a difficult situation, the British had every reason not to start delivering goods until the issue of delivery methods was fully worked out. It also follows from Gorsky's telegram that at that moment the British were afraid technical information could be intercepted by the Germans and decided to hold it back for some time.

Ultimately, Britain and the United States established the movement of Arctic convoys; the first of them, known under the code name "Dervish", departed from Iceland on August 21 and arrived in Arkhangelsk without loss on August 31. A total of 7 convoys were conducted in 1941, and during the entire war - 78. In 1941, the Arctic convoys delivered 484 British Hurricane fighters to the USSR, among other strategic cargoes.

Winston Churchill announced the need for military assistance to the USSR on June 22, 1941:

Any man or State who fights against Nazism will have our aid. Any man or State who marches with Hitler is our foe. This applies not only to organized States but to all representatives of that vile race of Quislings who make themselves the tools and agents of the Nazi regime against their fellow-countrymen and against the lands of their births. These Quislings, like the Nazi leaders themselves, if not disposed of by their fellow-countrymen, which would save trouble, will be delivered by us on the morrow of victory to the justice of the Allied tribunals. That is our policy and that is our declaration.

In Total during the war Soviet Union received 4174 aircraft from Great Britain as assistance (Hawker Hurricane fighters, and since 1943 - more modern Supermarine Spitfires), 1084 heavy tanks Mk II Matilda (the first - already with the second Arctic convoy in October 1941), 3782 light tank Mk I Valentine, 301 heavy tank Mk IV Churchill. On August 16, 1941, Great Britain provided the USSR with a £ 10 million loan for the purchase of weapons; later the loan amount increased to £ 60 million.

Read also similar stories: In September 1939 the USSR did not attack Poland but carried out the liberation campaign of the Red Army, There are three myths about WWII, WWII archives are open in Russia, whereas in Western countries they are kept secret and revisionism is promoted.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 227
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 18/12/2020
  • Outlet language(s) French, Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: USSR, UK, Germany, Russia
  • Keywords: Historical revisionism, WWII, Joseph Stalin, Secret services
see more

Lithuania is guilty of the bad relations with Russia

Ambassador of Lithuania in Russia Eitvydas Bajarunas complains that in Russia Lithuania is seen as a “small evil Russophobic state which only thinks how to hurt Russia”. He thinks that this stereotype is popular among the inhabitants of Russia.

The relations between Russia and Lithuania got worse during the period of governance of President Dalia Grybauskaite. She was famous for anti-Russian statements and Russophobic position. Nowadays authorities are keeping this position and regularly talk about the “Russian threat”.

This year “Homeland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats” party become part of the ruling coalition. Representatives of mentioned party constantly make statements about the threat of “Russian influence” and risks for national security. They are famous for their Russophobic position, criticals statements about Russia and radical offers.

Meanwhile, President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow is ready to collaborate with Vilnius on principles of good neighbourliness. He wants to see a similar position from the colleagues in Lithuania.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Russophobia in Lithuania.

The concerns about the security of Lithuania are being presented as elements of the anti-Russian position. Lithuania's assessment of the security environment are directly related to the Kremlin's illegal annexation of Crimea and armed aggression in Ukraine.

Kyiv will vaccinate residents of Donbas with an unsafe American vaccine

The Minister of Health of Ukraine Maksym Stepanov announced plans for the mass vaccination of residents of Donbas with an unsafe American vaccine against coronavirus. It has been repeatedly reported that the Pfizer vaccine, which the Ukrainian authorities rely on, is unsafe and can cause severe allergic reactions.

Disproof

This is part of a disinformation campaign aiming to discredit Ukraine and Western vaccines against Covid-19. See our article on the topic of vaccines - It is all in the headline: the subtle art of information manipulation.

There is no reason to believe that the Pfizer vaccine is dangerous. Clinical trials of vaccines are subject to government inspections, in particular, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US, which has access to patients participating in clinical trials, to documentation and other material evidence. The FDA did not accuse Pfizer of falsifying any clinical trials and successfully registered Pfizer's fluconazole after the said clinical trials.

US is creating biological weapons in Ukraine

The US destroys the scientific and technical potential of Ukraine and creates selective biological weapons.

The Americans have been working on a database of pathogen strains that they can use as biological weapons against “a particular race, genotype, territory of birth or residence.” Specifically, the newly emerged combat viruses should infect only the Eastern Slavs: Ukrainians, Russians, and Belarusians.

After the coup d’état, the curators received carte blanche to continue their parasitic activities in Ukraine.

Disproof

Recurring conspiracy theory alleging that the United States develops biological weapons and has secret biological laboratories around the world. The disinformation claim also capitalises on the oft-recurring conspiracy theories about laboratories in Ukraine and the coup in Ukraine in 2014.

There is no evidence that the US creates biological weapons in Ukraine or that these activities are directed against the 'Eastern Slavs'.