Disinfo: Joining NATO means deployment of Turkish military units on the territory of Georgia


By joining NATO, Georgia will integrate into Turkey. This is as obvious as two and two make four; everyone knows this except Georgia. Georgia’s entry into NATO means the deployment of Turkish military units on the territory of Georgia, and this suits Turkey’s interests. This is Turkey’s strategy for the future. Joining NATO means joining Turkey.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation message about NATO and Georgia.

It is false to claim that NATO membership will result in the deployment of Turkish troops on the Georgian territories. Joining NATO does not cause the deployment of troops of NATO or any other member state on the country’s territory. NATO deployments are usually transparent and in line with its international commitments and obligations. Read more about the enlargement process here.

Similar disinformation, as if NATO membership in Georgia means the deployment of NATO, or specifically Turkish military forces in Georgia, has been disseminated by Kremlin-affiliated actors in the past as well. Read the full debunk at Myth Detector.

NATO military infrastructure often become a target of pro-Kremlin disinformation. For example, in response to claims about the opening of a NATO base in Georgia, the Alliance responded that NATO bases are located only in the areas where the Alliance conducts its military operations, meaning that Georgia does not have a military base but a liaison office that cannot be considered a military base.

Media Development Foundation's media monitoring results revealed that the message about “Turkish NATO”, which equates the membership of the Alliance with the deployment of Turkish troops in Georgia, has been part of anti-Western disinformation in the country for years. Moreover, the narrative, at the same time, presents Russia as the only deterrent of the “Turkish intervention.”


  • Reported in: Issue 263
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 11/10/2021
  • Article language(s) Georgian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Georgia, Turkey
  • Keywords: NATO, EU/NATO enlargement, Military
see more

Disinfo: Green energy is a scam, Gazprom is safer

Alternative energy is a scam. For example, you can see in Germany many solar panels, which are covering fertile fields. And to compensate for the land, Germany had to go to Ukraine. Or, another example is wind power. It generates infrasound which is also damaging for ecology.

The gas crisis was allegedly provoked by its small reserves. Therefore, no more gas is needed - it must be abandoned altogether... Von der Leyen did not mention that the price of green generation, although stable, is still steadily high in comparison to what Gazprom could offer on the basis of long-term contracts.


A series of pro-Kremlin media reports on how harmful green energy is followed after the EU's criticism of the Russian 2021 Duma elections. The same pro-Kremlin outlets clearly articulated threats of increasing natural gas prices for the EU, what indeed happened.

In 2019, renewable energy represented 19.7% of the energy consumed in the EU-27, only 0.3% short of the 2020 target of 20%. The Renewable Energy Directive sets rules for the EU to achieve its 32% renewables target by 2030.

Disinfo: Election interference has become a typical thing in the West in relation to small countries

The recent publication of the Pandora papers could have influenced the result of the [parliamentary] election [in the Czech Republic] and Mr Babiš’s party. Essentially, we have witnessed yet another classic example of external election interference, which has become a normal thing in the West in relation to small countries.


There is no evidence to support the claim that Western countries interfered in the Czech parliamentary elections.

An Election Expert Team from the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) was invited to observe the 2021 Parliamentary Elections. The final report by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) stated that the "elections took place against the backdrop of a polarized political context" with the campaign overall being competitive. It doesn't mention anything about election interference.

Disinfo: The 2014 events in Ukraine were a coup d'état

The relationship between the Russian Federation and Ukraine deteriorated in 2014 after a coup d'état in Ukraine. Kyiv also launched a military operation against Donbas, whose citizens did not agree with the changes in power. Crimean authorities held a referendum about the reunification with Russia. Nearly 97% of Crimean voters and 96% of the citizens of Sevastopol have articulated their wish to reunite the peninsula with Russia.


The events in Ukraine in 2014 were not a coup d'état but rather a series of demonstrations which began in November 2013 on Independence Square (Maidan Nezalezhnosti) in Kyiv. The protests, also known as Maidan or Euromaidan, first began as a reaction to President Yanukovych’s refusal to continue with Ukraine-EU talks on the signing of the Association Agreement with the EU. The demonstrations later turned violent with many injured and even dead. Although pro-Kremlin media have been persistent in calling these events a coup, it cannot be labelled as one.

In Eastern Ukraine, Russia fuelled the separatist conflict with financial and military support, making Russia internationally recognised as a party to the conflict, not a mediator.