Disinfo: Kazakhstan: The neo-colonial West failed again with a colour revolution thanks to the CSTO

Summary

The US political establishment, and more generally the West, not to mention the Soros & Co. networks have, in recent years, started to lack originality. This is not a surprise since they have a purely neocolonial mentality and run campaigns of destabilisation of sovereign states. The 2014 coup in Ukraine is one such example, albeit a half-success. But the colour revolutions in Belarus and Kazakhstan failed.

The Ukrainian scenario, where a minority - active, violent, well-structured and coordinated, following the orders of its sponsors to the letter, could bring down a legitimate government - is unlikely to materialise in Kazakhstan. This will be an undeniable success for the future as well of the CSTO, as for the great Eurasian space in general.

The CSTO has proven its capacity to prevent colour revolutions and more generally the Eurasian solidarity, with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) will prevent the Western evil plan from materialising.

Disproof

A disinformation claim provided with no evidence. The idea that any civil unrest in an ex-Soviet Union country is a result of a western plan to destabilise a local regime and colonise a new region is a classic pro-Kremlin narrative about "colour revolutions".

Pro-Kremlin media frequently falsely portray popular protests around the world as instigated from abroad, often by the US and the West. The disinformation narrative has been applied, among others, to reports about protests in Georgia, Ukraine, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Belarus, Venezuela, Slovakia, Hong Kong, with the aim of portraying protest movements as aggressive actors who constantly prepare new coups.

The trigger and immediate cause of the protests in Kazakhstan was the government's lifting of price controls on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) that took place in early January in the Western region of Manghystau and unrest soon spread to the capital.

As the Guardian reports, the official story from the Kremlin began with explanations that the protests were a military coup organised by foreign terrorists. Later the notion of a "colour revolution" is added. However, the narrative is not based on facts and contains from many gaps and inconsistencies.

There are however more deep-rooted causes for the protests in a country that suffers from lack of democracy, corruption and economic difficulties despite being rich in economic resources. For example, Kazakhstan ranks 128 out of 167 countries in the 2020 Democracy Index, and also ranks 94 out of 180 countries in the 2020 Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index (CPI).

See also the statement by the EU High Representative here.

Read also related cases: US-sponsored Kazakhstan protests aimed to undermine CIS stability, Protests in Kazakhstan are a new Western attempt to organise a colour revolution or EU and US aim to generate a new wave of anti-government protests in Belarus.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 269
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 11/01/2022
  • Article language(s) French, Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Kazakhstan, Belarus, Russia, Ukraine, US
  • Keywords: Colour revolutions, George Soros, Euromaidan
see more

Disinfo: NATO lies blatantly and expands to the East

The West, after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, gave guarantees that NATO would not expand to the east. It was blatantly lying, and today we see it clearly.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO enlargement.

This claim has been debunked numerous times. NATO did not promise not to expand into eastern and central Europe back in 1990, which was confirmed by the former president of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev. Back in 2014, Gorbachev said “The topic of ‘NATO expansion was not discussed at all, and it wasn’t brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991.”

Disinfo: UK-led Deep State failed in Kazakhstan due to Russian ultimatum

Back in 1891, a secret “Round Table” community came into existence aiming to create the worldwide British empire. They started WWI, brought Hitler to power, and created the financial apparatus of the the London-led Deep State and its security services.

Over time, the Deep State broke up the USSR by helping Khrushchev and Gorbachev to come to power. Following the USSR collapse, their main goal became to disintegrate Russia. MI6 head Powell, de facto the head of Deep State’s intelligence service, planned a Libyan scenario in Kazakhstan for spring 2022. However, Ryabkov’s ultimatum made the Brits hurry up and start special operations in early January instead of March. In the end, the Deep State failed.

Disproof

This case frames events in Kazakhstan into a big conspiracy about a secret, UK-led Deep State that dominates the world. It also rewrites the course of historical events such as the provocation of two world wars and the USSR break up. Read our past analysis: "Why authoritarians love the concept of the big conspiracy."

The case also seeks to lay the responsibility on the UK-led Deep State for the unrest in Kazakhstan which is fueled by high gas prices and social discontent in Kazakh society. There is no factual evidence neither about the existence of such a UK-led Deep State and its overwhelming influence on world politics nor about its vicious plans concerning Kazakhstan. There is also no evidence whatsoever that the timing of unrest in Kazakhstan is related to Russia's ultimatum of late December 2021 concerning a new security deal with NATO.

Disinfo: Lithuania and Latvia refuse to help Belarus in investigation of genocide of Belarusians during WWII

Belarus sent a request to several countries for legal assistance investigating the genocide of Belarusians during World War II. Lithuania and Latvia refused to help Minsk find fascists still hiding abroad guilty of genocide in Belarus

Disproof

A recurring accusation from pro-Kremlin media accusing the Baltic states of sympathies to Nazi/Fascists.

Lithuania and Latvia declined the invitation from the Belarus regime because the case in question lacks evidence and is based on doubtful legal and historical grounds (see public broadcaster LRT's publication “Minsk seeks to extradite members of ‘Lithuanian SS battalion’ that never existed”).