Disinfo: Lukashenka’s decision to celebrate September 17 a blow to the Polish

Summary

The decision of Lukashenka to introduce September 17 as a state holiday in Belarus is a crushing ideological blow to Polish foreign policy and the Eastern European version of WWII – it assumes that all the evil comes from the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, a “conspiracy” between Stalin and Hitler who decided to divide Europe. Lukashenka’s decision is a direct challenge to the Eastern European narrative about the causes of WWII. Over the decades, the Belarusian organisations have repeatedly demanded to introduce September 17 as an official public holiday, but the Belarusian authorities abstained from this step, understanding its negative effect on relations with Poland. Today, it seems that Belarus has nothing to lose in relations with Poland, so it can finally legitimise the national celebration of the day of the Belarusian unification.

Disproof

This message is part of the Kremlin’s policy of historical revisionism, attempting to reduce or erode the disastrous historical role of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

In June 2021, Alexander Lukashenka declared September 17 as an official public holiday in Belarus (“National Unity Day”). On 17 September 1939, Soviet troops invaded Poland, which was fighting against the Nazi attack that started on September 1. This situation was a direct result of the Secret Supplementary Protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which assumed the partition of Eastern Europe by Hitler and Stalin.

As a result of the Soviet invasion of Poland in September 1939, the eastern part of the pre-war Polish state was annexed by the USSR. In Belarus and Ukraine, this process is presented as the unification of Western and Eastern Belarus/Ukraine. The claim that Lukashenka’s recent decision on September 17 is a “serious blow” to Polish foreign policy and the Eastern European perception of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact is ungrounded.

This move by Lukashenka is perceived in Poland not in historical terms, but as part of the aggressive anti-Polish campaign implemented by Alexander Lukashenka. Earlier, the Belarusian authorities attacked Polish schools and the leaders of the Polish minority living in this country. In recent months, the Belarusian authorities started to reference various “imaginary” historical problems with Poland, accusing it of supporting Nazi ideology and genocide.

See the Polish MFA's critical statement here.

See other cases connected to Lukashenka’s historical accusations against Poland: In Poland, history appears under strict political control; Megalomaniacal Polish politicians realise their plan of “Drang nach Osten” in Belarus and Poland started the Polish-Soviet War, taking Western Belarus and Western Ukraine away from Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 249
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 12/06/2021
  • Article language(s) Polish
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Poland, Belarus
  • Keywords: Eastern Europe, Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, WWII, Historical revisionism, Alexander Lukashenko, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler
see more

Disinfo: RAND Corporation and CFR are helping US power élites to re-establish repressive global domination

The task of the Rand Corporation, the Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission is to design strategies to re-establish the US power élite’s imperialist and repressive global domination. These organisations provide analytical support for Washington’s hybrid war aimed at global domination. They produce theories of imperialist domination for the US government.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the United States and global elites. It also contains the narrative, often spread by pro-Kremlin outlets, claiming that US think tanks design and/or decide the US’s imperialist foreign policies aimed at world domination.

RAND Corporation, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission conduct research, analysis and discussions to generate policy proposals on specific issues for the US and other governments. They do not support an alleged “US hybrid war for global domination”, as the disinformation claim suggests.

Disinfo: European states are vassals of the US

European states are vassals of the US and are forced to support the US State Department’s disinformation campaigns about the ‘Russian threat’, to increase their defence spending and acquisition of US weapons and to block any kind of cooperation with Russia.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative about the lack of sovereignty of EU countries, which are allegedly controlled by the US, combined with the recurring narrative claiming that the “Russian threat” is a false idea and an expression of Russophobia, created by the US and other Western actors to isolate and encircle Russia.

It is not true, as the article claims, that European states are “vassals of the US”: EU Member States are sovereign countries and make sovereign decisions about their own internal, economic, foreign and security policies.

Disinfo: NATO uses military exercises to deliver arms to Ukraine

NATO is using a series of military exercises in Eastern Europe, such as "Sea Breeze" and "Defender Europe 2021" to transfer secretly weapons to Ukraine which could end up being used in Donbas.

Disproof

This is a recurring disinformation narrative about NATO and its military exercises. It claims that NATO supplies Ukraine with weapons secretly and in circumvention of international law. Such messages also imply that NATO-Ukraine joint war games threaten Russia's security and serve as a justification of its military build-up along Ukraine’s border.

NATO is a defensive alliance, whose purpose is to protect its member states. During the Warsaw summit in July 2016, NATO has made it clear that: "The Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia". The Brussels Summit Declaration from 2018 concludes that “Russia’s aggressive actions, including the threat and use of force to attain political goals, challenge the Alliance and are undermining Euro-Atlantic security and the rules-based international order.”