Disinfo: Maia Sandu has advised Zelenskyy to start a military campaign against Donbas

Summary

The new President of Moldova, Maia Sandu, advised Volodymyr Zelenskеy to start a war with Donbas, because Ukraine, in her words, will not achieve anything by “soft actions”. […] In fact, she calls for stepping up hostilities and, as they say, “crushing” the DPR and LPR, destroying the Republics completely.

Disproof

This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the war in Ukraine.

Maia Sandu did not propose to start a military campaign against Donbas. In an interview with a Ukrainian online news outlet Evropeiska Pravda (the European Truth), she told that Moldova's experience in solving the situation in Prydnistrovya (Transnistria) may be useful for Ukraine. She also mentioned that in the case of Moldova, "soft actions" were not absolutely positive, and suggested that an international peace-keeping mission might be a better option.

"Despite all these steps, so far we got nowhere. And this experience can be useful to Ukraine in considering its actions on Donbas," Sandu told.

See similar disinformation cases on the war in Ukraine alleging that Biden's presidency will lead to a new war in Donbas, that Kyiv might launch a military "adventure" in Donbas, exploiting the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh, or that Ukraine is organising provocations in Donbas.

 

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 221
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 20/11/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Moldova, Ukraine
  • Keywords: Maia Sandu, Volodymyr Zelensky, DNR, Eastern Ukraine, LNR, War in Ukraine, Donbas

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Rail Baltica is built for the purposes of NATO

The Rail Baltica railroad is built in the Baltic States for purposes of North-Atlantic alliance. Without NATO, the purpose of this project is absolutely not clear.

Disproof

A recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative targetting NATO's presence in the Baltic states.

The Rail Baltica is a project of the European Union (not NATO). It is part of EU's North Sea-Baltic TEN-T corridor. The Rail Baltica is financed by the EU as well as by Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. It envisages a continuous rail link from Tallinn (Estonia) to Warsaw (Poland), going via Riga (Latvia) and Kaunas (Lithuania). The Baltic route should be completed by 2025; the link to Warsaw by 2030.

Crimea has realised the right to self-determination through a free, peaceful vote

The population of Crimea has realized the right to self-determination enshrined in the UN Charter through a free, peaceful vote that meets all international standards. Any discussions around the reunification of the peninsula with the Russian Federation are meaningless: the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol are fully integrated into the political, legal and economic space of the Russian Federation.

 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on the illegal annexation of Crimea.

The so-called referendum was organised under Russian illegal occupation without complying with neither the Ukrainian electoral code nor the Russian electoral code. The annexation has been condemned by the UN GA (see the resolution A/RES/68/262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine).

The EU and the US backed ISIS and other terrorist groups in Syria, Yemen and Iraq

The conclusion of the videoconference held by authorities from the European Council, the EU and those countries affected by the latest terrorist attacks is that maybe the solution lies in a more restrictive policy and in strengthening the Schengen borders. But if what you are doing is supporting and arming radical groups in Yemen, Syria and Iraq, if it was said that they were moderate rebels when afterwards it became clear that there has been cooperation with the Islamic State, and we are seeing how those people use US vehicles and weapons that come from Europe, how can you wash your hands at the end for what is happening on your own territory?

Disproof

Recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the West’s alleged support for terrorism in the Middle East.

Contrary to the claim, neither the European Union nor the US have cooperated with the Islamic State and terrorist groups. In fact, both the US and most EU members have taken part in the counter-terrorism mission Operation Inherent Resolve, while the EU established its own set of actions to counter Daesh.