Disinfo: The JIT tampered with the MH17 wreckage to hide an internal explosion on board

Summary

The Dutch investigators (JIT) manipulated the wreckage of the aircraft, modifying it for the sake of their version of the crash.

For example, one of the main pieces of material evidence is the front pressure bulkhead. As a result of an explosion in the cockpit, it was destroyed in several parts. They were found, brought to the Netherlands and … the torn metal was pulled back again, as if the whole frame was almost not affected by shelling of the Buk missile. The investigation did not want to show breaks.

By the totality of numerous facts, it became apparent that the reason for the MH17 crash was an internal explosion (explosions) on board.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the MH17, aiming to undermine the Joint International Investigation of the crash and subsequent criminal trial.

A special team, known as the Joint Investigation Team (JIT), was established to conduct the criminal investigation of the downing of the Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 in 2014. The team comprises officials from the Dutch Public Prosecution Service and the Dutch police, along with police and criminal justice authorities from Australia, Belgium, Malaysia and Ukraine.

Early on it was established that results of the criminal investigation must meet the standards that are set for an investigation in the Netherlands. This also applies to the other participating countries. This means that the JIT has agreed upon the rules and how the evidence should be collected in other countries. The cooperation in the JIT has made it possible for Dutch and Australian police officers to work on Ukrainian territory, together with Ukrainian investigating officers.

In order to find out the cause of the crash, the Joint Investigation Team investigated all human remains, personal belongings and wreckage of the aircraft found in the vicinity of the disaster site. The traces were secured and investigated and compared by experts. In addition, the JIT sought and heard witnesses and experts, analysed radar and satellite images, assessed large amounts of telecom data such as intercepted telephone conversations and analysed big data. Read more about the investigation here.

Based on the investigation the JIT has concluded that flight MH17 was shot down on 17 July 2014 by a missile of the 9M38 series, launched by a BUK-TELAR, from farmland in the vicinity of Pervomaiskiy. At that time, the area was controlled by pro-Russian fighters. The BUK-TELAR was brought in from the territory of the Russian Federation and subsequently, after having shot down flight MH17, was taken back to the Russian Federation. The public hearing started on 9 March 2020 in the Netherlands.

For our overview and analysis of disinformation narratives around the downing of MH17, click here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 194
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 21/04/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Russia, Ukraine
  • Keywords: MH17
  • Outlet: Novye Izvestia
see more

Strange coincidence of epidemics and research laboratories supported by the US in Ukraine

The US embassy in Ukraine officially recognised that they keep toxins and pathogens in Ukraine. Strangely, epidemics started next to those facilities.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about "secret laboratories" in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. See examples of similar disinformation narratives about the Lugar laboratory in Tbilisi, Georgia.

The US supports the research against dangerous infectious diseases through the Biological Threat Reduction Program. The US Embassy in Ukraine reaffirmed that the country offers its support to ensure Ukraine can detect and report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats.

London doctors classify coronavirus patients based on their “worthiness”

London doctors have explained to the community how they will “classify” coronavirus patients: young patients without comorbidities will be treated in a field hospital. The elderly, who have fewer chances of survival, will be assigned to public hospitals. There, they are asked, first of all, to sign a pledge not to demand resuscitation if their situation becomes worse. But many patients rebelled against this decision. As a result, the doctors adopted a special algorithm, according to which a patient is deemed “worthy” of an ICU bed and respirator or not.

Disproof

A claim provided with no evidence, and a recurrent narrative about the West’s inability to manage the coronavirus crisis–as well as sacrificing its elderly for economic reasons.

In fact, since the start of the crisis, the main focus of the medical and social services of Western states is to assist the older population as it is the main risk group for this disease.