Disinfo: Migration crisis can become a turning point in the EU history, its collapse is incoming

Summary

The EU is facing a financial and ideological crisis. It has insufficient money to accommodate migrants. It also failed to integrate migrants who arrived in the EU in the past. The EU fails to do what it preaches when it comes to liberal values and openness to migrants. The EU also proved that it cannot live peacefully with Belarus – for many years it has been trying to swallow it, either promising benefits for being loyal in conflict with Moscow or introducing strict sanctions. The current crisis the EU faces can become a turning point after which, if not a collapse, then a degradation is probable. The EU will either degrade and turn into a ghetto of migrants or will undergo a serious cultural transformation.

Disproof

Recurrent pro-Kremlin claim and disinformation about EUs imminent collapse.

This publication obfuscates the actual reasons behind EU sanctions against the Belarusian regime and promotes recurring disinformation narratives about Western attempts to disrupt Belarusian-Russian relations, about the decadent EU and its imminent disintegration, and the ongoing migration situation on the eastern border of the European Union with Belarus.

The EU did not recognise the falsified results of the Belarusian Presidential election on 9 August 2020 or the new mandate claimed by Alyaksandr Lukashenka. On 2 October 2020, the Council imposed the first round of restrictive measures over ongoing repression. The EU imposed two more rounds of restrictive measures against the Belarusian regime in 2020, followed by the fourth package of sanctions in view of the escalation of serious human rights violations and the forced landing of a Ryanair flight.

On 15 November 2021, the EU broadened the scope for sanctions to tackle hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants. The EU will now be able to target individuals and entities organising or contributing to activities by the Lukashenka regime that facilitate the illegal crossing of the EU's external borders. This came amid the growing instrumentalisation of migration by the Belarusian authorities.

Earlier, European Commission President von der Leyen has stated that the situation on the EU-Belarus border is "the attempt of an authoritarian regime to try to destabilise its democratic neighbours". Similarly, High Representative Josep Borrell has highlighted that the Lukashenka regime is weaponising human beings as a tool for political purposes by giving migrants false expectations and putting them in a situation of extreme vulnerability.

Read earlier disinformation cases alleging that the EU adopts sanctions against Belarus to manage its own internal contradictions, that migrants in Lithuania are kept in concentration camps in unsanitary conditions, and that the West needs to tear Belarus away from Russia.

See our articles on the Belarus migrants situation here and here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 266
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 15/11/2021
  • Article language(s) Russian
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Belarus, EU, Russia
  • Keywords: Migration crisis, migration, EU disintegration
see more

Disinfo: Brussels blamed Minsk for the migration crisis, but the West is the only responsible

Brussels blamed Minsk for the migration crisis, but the West is the only responsible. The problem of irregular migratory flows at the EU-Belarus border is in fact due to the Western policies, including decades of military interventions in the Middle East and North Africa.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative accusing the West of causing migration crisis on the border of Belarus with Lithuania, Latvia and Poland.

In 2021, LithuaniaPoland and Latvia faced an influx of irregular migrants from Belarus. Earlier, Belarus had ended cooperation with the EU to stem illegal migration. This was Lukashenka's answer to the European Union sanctions on the political regime of Belarus (read more about sanctions here). Lukashenka's regime is using migrants from the Middle East as "political and hybrid" tools against Lithuania and the entire EU.

Disinfo: Europe is guilty of the situation on the Belarusian-Polish border; wants to shift blame

European countries are guilty of the migration crisis. Europe is trying to avoid responsibility for the events on the Belarusian-Polish border. The causes of the migration crisis are political, economic and military. European countries create conditions for the arrival of thousands or hundreds of thousands of migrants. Now Europe wants to shift the blame to other countries, including Russia.

Disproof

The message is recurring disinformation about the migration crisis on the EU-Belarus border.

There is plenty of evidence that the Belarusian authorities have instigated the ongoing migration crisis in Lithuania, Poland and Latvia. Lukashenka's regime is using migrants from the Middle East as "political and hybrid" tools against Lithuania and the entire EU. Commissioner Ylva Johansson said, inter alia: "The authoritarian regime in Belarus is exploiting human beings for political reasons: this is completely unacceptable."

Disinfo: After the Warsaw Pact's dissolution, NATO has no purpose

All nations should think now, not tomorrow, about how to get rid of “NATO” bases on their soil, and the Arab countries should stay away from “NATO”, the military alliance, which after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact no longer has a clear goal. What threatens "NATO" now, and what are its goals?

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about NATO.

NATO’s objectives are set out in the 1949 Washington Treaty which forms the legal basis of the alliance. The treaty states that parties “are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security”. Since then, more countries have chosen to join NATO. The Alliance has taken on new missions and adapted to new challenges, all the while sticking to its fundamental principles of security, collective defence, and decision-making by consensus.