Disinfo: Moldova receives refugees refused by EU


Moldova accepted the first refugees from Bangladesh, whom Italy refused. Although their asylum status has not yet been determined, Chisinau is preparing to receive guests, developing a special mechanism for such cases. Despite the quota set for accepting migrants, Italy, which is a member of the European Union, has not yet accepted any. Will the flow of migrants be redirected from Italy to Moldova, which is not even a member of the EU and does not even have the necessary resources for it?.




Recurring narrative about immigration imposed on Moldova by the EU in a similar electoral context. No evidence given that the asylum seekers had had their application denied by Italian authorities (or even that they had made one).

Moldova is implementing a readmission agreement with the EU, thanks to which it benefits from the liberalised visa regime. According to this agreement, Moldova is obliged to accept back only those persons who illegally enter the territory of the EU through the Moldovan territory

Further debunking from Stopfals.md.


  • Reported in: Issue 136
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 11/02/2019
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Italy, Moldova
  • Keywords: migration, EU, Refugees, Migration crisis
  • Outlet: Vedomosti Moldova
see more

UK destroying evidence on the Skripal case

London is destroying evidence related to the Skripal case. British military started to remove the roof from Skripals’ home in Salisbury. It is strange why they don’t dismantle also the walls.


In fact, the roof of Skripals' home in Salisbury is to be completely removed as part of decontamination work to remove potential traces of nerve agent. The reason of this measure is make sure "no contamination was taken from the door into the roof space". No evidence given about UK allegedly destroying evidence.

Many competing and contradictory stories promulgated by Russian state-controlled media on the Skripal poisoning.

Prime Minister May caught lying: Porton Down denied Novichok came from Russia

Prime Minister Theresa May lied when she claimed that the toxic substance used in the Skripal poisoning case was manufactured in Russia: Porton Down has later denied her claim.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the the Skripal poisoning. For more examples see here.

The Porton Down has not contradicted any statements by the British Prime Minister. The report from the OPCW confirmed the UK findings in the Skripal poisoning, specifically the purity of the toxin. 

Ukraine responsible for clash in Kerch sea

Kiev wants to make the Sea of Azov accessible to NATO forces and Ukraine could be responsible for the naval incident in the Straits of Kerch. Russia’s actions were entirely legitimate. According to the data of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), the Ukrainian ships had approached the Straits without any warning, had not waited for the Russian pilot and had not complied with the indications of the border guards, thus violating the legislation. The provocations may have continued throughout the day, leading the Russian side to open fire, injuring three Ukrainians and stopping the ships.


The article is a complication of evidence provided by the Russian security services FSB. The story has been published here also.

According to the research group Bellingcat, data, based on geolocated video footage, confirms that Ukrainian ships did enter Russian-claimed territorial waters (They are, in fact, only Russian-claimed territorial waters, rather than internationally recognised boundaries), both that of Crimea and mainland Russia in the Kerch Strait. Ukraine, nonetheless, argues this was legally permissible due to the 2003 agreement between the two countries. Secondly, we can say that the Ukrainian tug ‘Yani Kapu’ was intentionally rammed at least four times over a period of at least an hour. Thirdly, based on information provided by the Russian FSB which appears to incriminate themselves, the shooting of the ‘Berdyansk’ most likely took place in international waters.