Disinfo: Nagorno-Karabakh conflict serves the purposes of Anglo-Saxons

Summary

This is a knot, which serves the purposes of Anglo-Saxons, the [conflict] is periodically instigated. The British and the US are behind Turkey. In this region [the Caucasus, Crimea], we [Russia] have been vying with the UK over the course of 200 years. The British have pushed the Turkish to the front as cannon fodder. 

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the recent escalation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict alleging that the latter is due to external interference.

There is no evidence that foreign powers had anything to do with the 2020 military confrontation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, or that the UK and US are behind Turkey, using the latter as cannon folder.

See other examples in our database, such as claims that clashes in Nagorno Karabakh are part of an anaconda ring plan against Russia; that Armenia and Azerbaijan are part of historic Russia; that Nagorno-Karabakh conflict leads to more tensions in Donbas; or that Ukrainian nationalists will be sent to fight in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The "Anglo-Saxons" is a frequently evoked, mythical adversary in pro-Kremlin media. Read more here!

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 216
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14/10/2020
  • Language/target audience: Russian
  • Country: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, UK, Russia, US
  • Keywords: Nagorno-Karabakh

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

A continuation of bad US and NATO policies across Russia’s neighbourhood

The attempt to create hotbeds of trouble and tension in the countries neighbouring Russia, by investing in the technology of “colour revolutions”, and exploiting the real and legitimate pursuit of peoples in their search for freedom and democracy, promoting feelings of anger and using violence and sowing sectarian and ethnic strife, to change political systems and interfere in the internal affairs of countries with Sovereignty, is nothing but a continuation of the bad Western policies pursued by the United States and NATO, seeking hegemony and imposing de facto policies, and unipolar sovereignty.

Disproof

Recurrent pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative framing popular protests as Western-backed colour revolutions, and the NATO as a geopolitical project of the US, allegedly pursuing a belligerent and hostile anti-Russian agenda.

No evidence is provided to support the mentioned allegations.

Berlin doesn’t have evidence that Navalny was poisoned

Germany had claimed that [Alexei] Navalny had been subjected to a poisoning attempt with the nerve-stimulating substance “Novichok”, after it said that doctors found traces of this substance in a sample of Navalny’s blood, taken at the Charité hospital in Berlin, where Navalny was transferred from Omsk, Russia.

Berlin did not rely on any evidence, prompting Moscow to describe the incident as a charade designed to justify the imposition of new sanctions on it.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny's poisoning.

Navalny fell ill during a flight and the plane had to make an emergency landing in Omsk in Russia, before being transferred to Berlin where the German Federal government said that toxicological tests provided “unequivocal evidence of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group” in the blood samples of Alexei Navalny.

Reunification with Russia paved the way for Tatar’s language in Crimea

The Crimean Tatar people did not acquire their official language, which they were deprived of during the Ukrainian era, not until after the reunification of Crimea with Russia, and they obtained legal possession of mosques, which was opposed by Kyiv, and they obtained protection from the hostile extremist sects that fought them for many years and were liberated of stirring up hostility with the rest of the population of the peninsula, which was fueled by the Ukrainian capital.

Disproof

Pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Crimea and its illegal annexation.

Crimea was annexed by Russia following an illegitimate referendum on March 16 2014, following the deployment of “little green men” across the peninsula beginning in February 2014. Read more about Crimea's annexation here.