Disinfo: NATO and EU are actively fabricating Russophobia in the Baltic States to justify their anti-Russian policies


The interests of the NATO and EU powers in the Baltic States are determined by the geographical situation and the possibilities to use the Baltic States as a disruptive factor against peaceful conditions of cooperation and understanding in the region and in neighbourly relations with Russia.

The powers of NATO and the EU are actively interfering in the shaping of internal relations of the Baltic States; their focus is on the creation of “fear of the Baltic towards the Russians”. This fear can be instrumentalised externally for the goals of the NATO and EU powers for the control of Baltic States against Russia. An enemy image of Russia is created. The effect on the cultivation of Russophobia is achieved through the systematic fomenting of internal political contrasts between different nationalities. The Western powers need this atmosphere of fear and instability to justify their anti-Russian policies.

Especially after the accession of the Baltic states to NATO and the EU, the West has shown that it is determined to further develop this geographical area on Russia’s western borders and to actively use it for its geopolitical goals. The nature of these measures, as well as the military-political steps, show that its policy towards Russia is increasingly degenerating towards military confrontation. For the Baltic Sea and its neighbours and for Europe, this means increasing militarisation and the danger of war.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Russophobia in Lithuania and the Baltic States. Also consistent with a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO encircling Russia.

For more than two decades, NATO has worked to build a partnership with Russia, developing dialogue and practical cooperation in areas of common interest. Cooperation has been suspended since 2014 in response to Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine but political and military channels of communication remain open. Concerns about Russia’s continued destabilising pattern of military activities and aggressive rhetoric go well beyond Ukraine. Read more about NATO - Russia relations here. 

See similar pro-Kremlin disinformation cases: "Russophobia is the main export of Lithuania", NATO is closing in on Russia's borders; The European foreign policy is determined by a group of Russophobes controlled from US. 


  • Reported in: Issue177
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 16/12/2019
  • Language/target audience: German
  • Country: Latvia, Russia, Estonia, Lithuania
  • Keywords: Encircling Russia, Russophobia, Warmongering


Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

see more

Elites promote migration to Europe to prevent an alliance between right-wing and left-wing populism

Populism is a revolt against liberal-globalist domination. It is a protest against, and rejection of, the status-quo and the establishment. Right-wing populism fights for the defence of traditional values (family, normal relationships between the sexes, nation, church, roots and identity), which are under extinction and are being annihilated. Left-wing populism struggles for the rights of workers and for social justice against capitalists. Liberal-globalist élites, Soros, globalists, bankers, the EU, all élites aim to keep right-wing and left-wing populism separate, to prevent an alliance between them. As long as these two kinds of populism are separated and do not form an alliance, they will not pose a threat to the system. Liberalism also promotes migration flows into Europe because the issue of migrants creates division between right-wing and left-wing populism.


Conspiracy theory. Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about mass immigration being used as a weapon by powerful liberal-globalist élites to pursue their own interests (such as weakening and destabilising European countries) and about Soros and his foundation being behind the migration crisis.

The refugee crisis in Europe is a consequence of Syria’s civil war which forced more than 4.5 million people to flee their homeland, and/or of other crises (such as violent conflict, and economic and environmental stresses in Africa), and has nothing to do with liberalism nor “liberal globalist élites”.

EOD Centre in Moldova is part of the US European Command

The recently opened Mine Action Centre in Straseni is actually officially part of the US European Command, whose head is also the Supreme Allied Commander.


This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about  EU/NATO enlargement and the US controlling Moldovan authorities. Read here another case claiming that American built military facilities near the Transnistria region.

The training centre of excellence in Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) in Negresti village Strășeni district has been opened on November 8, 2019, with the aim to train militaries who will participate in missions for demining and neutralizing unexploded bombs and ammunition, which are still on the Moldovan territory after the Second World War.

Normandy summit results: the EU plays on Russia’s side and betrayed Kyiv, no bright future for Ukraine

Ukraine has put itself in a situation when external forces dictate how it should solve its internal problems. Kyiv expected that its Western allies will put pressure on Russia in the Normandy Four format. However, the allies realised that their confrontation with Russia will cost them more. Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel supported Russia’s position and put even bigger pressure on Ukraine than Vladimir Putin did. Eventually Zelenskyy found himself in solitude, because Russia, Germany, and France had nearly identical positions regarding the resolution of the civil conflict in Ukraine. Ukrainian politicians wrongfully remain confident that the West will always unconditionally support any Russophobic regime and that Ukraine can just carry out its foreign policy and security under the West’s authority to enjoy its protection.

Ukraine could slam the door and declare that it no longer needs the Normandy format. However, it is the last remaining material evidence of Ukraine’s unity with the West and of its “movement” towards Europe, which Kyiv can present to the Ukrainian people. If the truth is told to the Ukrainians that Europe, represented by Paris and Berlin, is already playing along with Russia, then Ukrainian people will reasonably question, for what were people sacrificed and state and society destroyed, if in the end, Europe betrayed Ukraine, Ukraine will never be in the EU, and a “bright future” will never come.


This article misrepresents the actual German and French positions in the Normandy summit and masks the clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity by acts of aggression by the Russian armed forces since February 2014 as Ukraine's "internal problems" and "civil conflict". It also challenges Ukrainian statehood and sovereignty and promotes recurring pro-Kremlin propagandistic narrative about Ukraine's inevitable bleak future, its disintegration and imminent collapse.

The claim that Germany and France play along with Russia is groundless. According to the Common Agreed Conclusions of the Normandy summit of 9 December 2019, "The Minsk agreements (Minsk Protocol of 5 September 2014, Minsk Memorandum of 19 September 2014 and the Minsk Package of Measures of 12 February 2015) continue to be the basis of the work of the Normandy format whose member states are committed to their full implementation." The Minsk Package of Measures of 12 February 2015, among other things, without mentioning Russian personnel and hardware by name, calls for the "withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under monitoring of the OSCE" (para 10).