NATO forces could be used against European states opposing the US’s wishes

Summary

NATO forces could be used against the governments of European states which take decisions that go against the US’s wishes. This idea is supported  by The New York Times, which is the mouthpiece of the US “deep state”. The Armed Forces of NATO member states obey orders issued by the US military command.

Disproof

This message is consistent with a basic pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative on US relations with EU countries. Pro-Kremlin outlets often allege that different countries, America's transatlantic allies in this case, are US vassals and remain under the American thumb. See earlier examples: Poland is US's vassal state, Europe is occupied by the US and has limited sovereignty, the EU is directed by Washington, Germany is the executor of US hegemony over Europe.

NATO is a political and military alliance, and NATO member states make sovereign decisions about their own security. NATO and US military presence in these states is possible only on the basis of the clear consent of the hosting nation. Moreover, all NATO decisions are made by consensus, after discussion and consultation among member countries.

The New York Times article referred to by Sputnik discusses recent military exercises in Eastern Europe, involving US special forces - and the special forces of several Eastern European states - aimed at thwarting hybrid warfare operations [that is, operations that involve a mix of subversion, cyber-attacks and information warfare].

For other disinfo cases related to NATO see here.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 158
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 15/07/2019
  • Language/target audience: Italian
  • Country: US, EU
  • Keywords: Military exercise, Sovereignty, NATO
  • Outlet: Sputnik Italia
see more

The US is entirely responsible for the demise of the INF treaty

The US is entirely responsible for the demise of the INF treaty. Its action has destructive consequences for the security of the US’s European allies.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative claiming that the US is entirely responsible for the demise of the INF treaty.

Russia bears primary responsibility for the end of the INF Treaty, because it has produced, tested and deployed the 9M729 missile, which violates it. In July 2014 the then-US President Obama officially accused Russia of testing a missile in violation of the INF Treaty, which  prohibits the US and Russia from possessing, producing or test-flying  ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5500 kilometers.

Tbilisi, Baku and Yerevan won’t join EU and NATO unless they hold LGBT pride

Does anyone think that Tbilisi, Baku and Yerevan will be able to join the EU or NATO until they hoist the LGBT community flag?

Disproof

No evidence given. Recurring pro-Kremlin narrative claiming the morally corrupt West obliges other countries to conduct Pride parades and imposes the legalization of gay marriages.

The claim is consistent with "'threatened values' narrative which is one of the most common narratives used by pro-Kremlin disinformation outlets.

Trading American weapons is one of the main goals of NATO’s existence

Trading American weapons is one of the main goals of NATO’s existence.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about NATO portraying it as an aggressive organization with intent to destroy the world order.

NATO’s essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means. Collective defence is at the heart of the Alliance and creates a spirit of solidarity and cohesion among its members.