NATO, led by the US, is closing in on Russia’s borders, pushing the infrastructure forward

Summary

NATO, led by the US, is closing in on Russia’s borders, constantly pushing the infrastructure forward. The alliance’s forces have thoroughly taken control of the territory of the Baltic States and Poland. Now they are also trying to settle in Ukraine.

Disproof
Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about NATO threatening Russia and NATO's expansion.
The claim that NATO is encircling Russia is one of the myths about NATO. Russia's land border is just over 20,000 kilometres long. Of that, less than one-sixteenth (1,215 kilometres), is shared with NATO members. Russia has land borders with 14 countries. Only five of them are NATO members. Outside NATO territory, the Alliance only has a military presence in two places: Kosovo and Afghanistan. Both operations are carried out with a United Nations mandate, endorsed by the UN Security Council, of which Russia is a member. In contrast, Russia has military bases and soldiers in three EU's Eastern neighborhood countries – Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine – without the consent of their governments.
NATO's presence in the Baltic countries or Poland, is at the request of the host nations. NATO does not "expand" in the imperialistic sense described by the Kremlin  and Russian state media, but instead considers the applications of candidate countries that want to join the defensive alliance of their own national will. NATO enlargement is not directed against Russia.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 163
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 06/09/2019
  • Language/target audience: Armenian, Russian
  • Country: Russia, Poland, Ukraine, Baltic states
  • Keywords: EU/NATO enlargement, Encircling Russia
  • Outlet: Sputnik Armenia
see more

UK’s Porton Down laboratory disproved that Novichok was made in Russia

The US introduced new sanctions against Russia in relation to the Skripals’ poisoning. London was quick to declare Russia’s responsibility for the accident. The Russian authorities denied their involvement, offered investigative assistance to the UK and demanded consular access to Skripal’s daughter. All official Russian requests were ignored by the UK. The UK’s laboratory in Porton Down disproved that the poisonous substance was produced in Russia.

Disproof

This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Skripal poisoning in the UK, attempting to divert attention from Russia's proven responsibility for the attack.

By March 2018, EUvsDisinfo had already collected 20 different narratives about the Skripal case. It had catalogued over 100 disinformation messages around the Salisbury attack. The disinformation messages implying a UK government conspiracy behind the Skripal case are an often-used method of applying a pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Salisbury poisoning.

The Americans seek a full scale war in Ukraine

The goal of John Bolton’s visit to Ukraine was to pull it into a full-scale war. The Americans need a full-scale war.

The Americans are in full control of the situation and allow “vampires” from the Ukrainian side to make money in this local war. That’s why they build bio-labs, where they kidnap people, sell their organs. They earn from human trafficking, drug and arms trade. Americans allow all of this to happen and when it becomes necessary they will unleash this horde on Donbas. Their goal is a full scale war in Ukraine.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory based on recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about war in Eastern Ukraine  and  US presence in Europe.

The disinformation message aims to obfuscate  clear violations of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity by acts of aggression by the Russian armed forces since February 2014. See previous examples of the pro-Kremlin disinformation claiming that Washington and Brussels pushed Ukraine towards civil war, and that the West wanted to stage a global war in Ukraine.

Abkhazia and Samachablo have never been part of Georgia

Abkhazia and Samachablo were not parts of Georgia until the October Revolution and the first years of Soviet rule. A forced “Georgianisation“ policy was carried out there.

Disproof

This claim is untrue and represents an example of historical revisionism. Historically, also during the Russian Empire, both the Tskhinvali region and Abkhazia were always integral parts of Georgia. In 1858, Abkhazia was a part of Kutaisi Governorate, whereas, in 1905, Tskhinvali region was a part of Tiflis Governorate.

Based on the 1920 Moscow Agreement, Soviet Russia recognized Georgia as an independent country. According to the agreement, Russia recognized Georgia with Tiflis, Kutaisi, and Batumi Governorates and all its “uyezds” and “okrugs”, including Tskhinvali and Abkhazia.