Disinfo: NATO’s new military strategy aims to defeat Russia in the new nuclear arms race and to ruin Russia’s economy


NATO’s new military strategy aims to eliminate Russia as a military and economic competitor. According to this new strategy, NATO must defeat Russia in the nuclear arms race and ruin [“bleed”] Russia’s economy.


Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative, portraying NATO as a threat to peace and having a belligerent agenda. There is no evidence that the new NATO strategy seeks to  “eliminate Russia as a military competitor”, nor that it aims to “defeat Russia in the nuclear arms race” and to “ruin the Russian economy”.

On the 22nd of May 2019 NATO Allied Chiefs of Defence met in Brussels for the 181st Military Committee in Chiefs of Defence Session.  At the meeting the Allied Chiefs of Defence discussed and signed NATO’s new military strategy.

As NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg explained to Welt am Sontag, since 2014 NATO faces a  new security environment and new security challenges from the East and from the South. Among the new challenges , according to Stoltenberg, is a heightened Russian nuclear threat.  The new NATO military strategy has been developed in order to adapt to this new security environment.

Stoltenberg had previously expressed NATO’s concern about Russia’s military build-up and non-compliance of the INF Treaty. He also stated that NATO would not engage in a nuclear arms race with Russia:  “NATO has no intention of deploying land-based nuclear missiles in Europe…. but NATO will always take the necessary steps to provide credible and effective deterrence.”


  • Reported in: Issue 152
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 25/05/2019
  • Language/target audience: Italian
  • Country: Russia
  • Keywords: NATO
  • Outlet: Sputnik Italia
see more

Ukrainian agents and extremists may be preparing acts of sabotage in Crimea

Ukrainian intelligence services and members of extremist organisations may be preparing acts of sabotage in Crimea, namely in the Kerch strait, and provocations against Russian and foreign ships visiting Crimean harbours, according to the chief of the border guard of the Federal Security Service of Russia (FS), general Vladimir Kulishov.


No evidence is provided to support the allegation.

These affirmations are consistent with the recurrent Russian narrative of Crimea as legally "reunified" with Russia and Ukraine as a destabilizing force, and Russia's claims about the Azov Sea and the Kerch Strait  incident. These messages have intensified after the hearing of the International Tribunal for the Law of Sea on May 10 about the detention of Ukrainian vessels in the Kerch Strait. Russia refused to take part in the hearing, saying that the court had no jurisdiction in this case, and is trying to change the framework by insisting in "provocations" by the other part.

Romanians are not interested in European elections

Despite political agitation, Romanians are not interested in the European elections. The reason is that these European elections do not change anything and only Westerners are fighting for decision-making posts in the EU.
Romanians realised quickly that their votes do not matter and that European Parliament does not have real policy-making power.

This message is in line with the pro-Kremlin narrative on the disintegration of the EU.

Turnout at the European Parliament elections in Romania has significantly improved from 32.44% of the voters in 2014 to 49.22% of voters, according to the Central Electoral Bureau. Additionally, the latest Eurobarometer shows that six out of ten Romanians tend to trust the European Parliament.

Poland plans to take over Minsk after extensive subversive activities in Belarus

In 2006, Poland adopted a state programme for building the Fourth Rzeczpospolita. Its goal is to extend Poland’s cultural and political domination over the territories which were part of the first Rzeczpospolita until the late XVIII century. This geopolitical project directly concerns Belarus and Ukraine.
The state programme has both humanitarian and military elements. Under the latter, an increasing militarisation of Poland must be taken into account. The former envisages increasing Polish influence over Belarus by issuing the Pole’s Card to Belarusian citizens and the promotion of Polish historic views among Belarusian intelligentsia, officials and students.
The humanitarian element is a first phase, its objectives are to trick, deceive, derussify and to take away the sense of self-preservation from Belarusian society as well as to disrupt the allied relations between Belarus and Russia. Following this phase, Poland plans to send its troops to take over Minsk as in 1919.
Given this, only a strong Union with Great Russia is a true guarantee of Belarus’ territorial integrity and its sustainable development.


This is a conspiracy theory with no evidence given. It is consistent with recurring pro-Kremlin narratives about Polish plans to re-establish its empire at the expense of its Eastern neighbours, and about the West's plans to disrupt Belarusian-Russian relations and to destabilise Belarus.

Poland respects the territorial integrity of its neighbouring states and does not have a state programme to establishing the Fourth Rzeczpospolita. The IV Rzeczpospolita, or Fourth Republic, was a plan for a moral revolution and political change put forward in the late 1990s by the Polish conservative philosopher Rafał Matyja and used in public discourse to describe the 2005-2007 period, when the Law and Justice party was in the government for the first time. However, this concept has nothing to do with establishing a Polish empire at the expense of Poland's eastern neighbours, including Belarus. Read more about the use of conspiracy here.