Disinfo: Navalny could have been poisoned with Novichok in Germany

Summary

There is every reason to believe that Navalny could have been exposed to Novichok in Germany or on his way there.

How else can the sudden appearance of toxins in Navalny’s blood samples be explained? After all, the tests which Navalny underwent in Russia found no trace of toxic substances.

Despite no solid evidence proving this, Russia was very quickly accused of using a banned nerve agent and punished with EU sanctions.

Disproof

This claim is part of a wider set of conspiracy theories promulgated by pro-Kremlin media in relation to the August 2020 poisoning of Alexei Navalny. It also advances the recurring pro-Kremlin narrative casting a substantial chunk of Western decision-making as motivated by anti-Russian sentiment.

This claim is made without evidence and paints a truly remarkable version of events, according to which Navalny fell ill in Russia and slipped into a coma for reasons totally unrelated to poison. He was then flown to Germany where he was administered a deadly nerve agent, and then immediately treated both for poisoning with said agent and for the mysterious illness he had developed back in Russia, resulting in his full recovery.

Clinical findings(opens in a new tab) at the Charité hospital indicated that Navalny was poisoned with a substance from the group of cholinesterase inhibitors. Subsequent toxicological tests provided unequivocal evidence of a chemical nerve agent of the Novichok group(opens in a new tab) in the blood samples of Alexei Navalny.

These findings were later independently corroborated by labs in France and Sweden, and finally confirmed by the OPCW. The OPCW stated that "[t]he biomarkers of the cholinesterase inhibitor found in Mr Navalny’s blood and urine samples have similar structural characteristics to the toxic chemicals belonging to schedules 1.A.14 and 1.A.15."

Pro-Kremlin media proxies have used similar techniques to obscure Russia's role in the 2018 Skripal poisoning and in the 2020 Navalny poisoning. See here for an overview of parallel narratives which pro-Kremlin media have employed in both incidents.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 220
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 13/11/2020
  • Outlet language(s) English
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Germany, Russia
  • Keywords: novichok, Alexei Navalny, Chemical weapons/attack, Russophobia
see more

Social media outlets are censoring Trump and everyone who has their own view of events

Senior high-tech officials have strengthened their strict oversight processes before, during and after the US presidential election trying to control debate and public political discussion.

In recent days, Donald Trump himself, several of his supporters, and people who have their own view of events have all been censored by Facebook and Twitter.

Disproof

Pro-Kremlin conspiracy theory about social media, advancing pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about “secret elites” and the West's alleged media censorship and societal control.

There is no evidence that social media outlets are censoring US President Donald Trump or his supporters. The day before the article was published, the top 10 performing Facebook posts included four posts from Donald Trump, three from conservative news outlets Fox News and Newsmax, one from evangelist missionary and Trump supporter Franklin Graham, and one tweet from the White House.

The OPCW has a policy of throwing baseless accusations 

Russia may consider withdrawing from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), if the organisation continues its policy of bias against certain countries.

The accusations levelled against the Syrian authorities of using chemical weapons, Moscow and Damascus confirmed that there is no evidence of these accusations.

What happened with the former client, Sergey Skripal, and the activist, Alexei Navalny, also comes in the context of the bias of the organisation that did not base its statements on any facts or evidence.

The OPCW is an important organisation, although it is losing its credibility.

Disproof

Recurring disinformation narratives attacking the independence and integrity of the OPCW and a disinformation narrative about the Salisbury and Navalny poisonings.

According to the OPCW's Director-General, the organisation has been targeted by a disinformation campaign when it granted new powers to assign blame for chemical attacks. 18 countries issued a joint statement, which called for an end to the unacceptable Russian defamation of the OPCW. Regarding the other allegations in the article:

British MI6 behind Turkey's actions in Karabakh

British MI6’s ears stick out behind Turkey’s actions in Karabakh. Pan-Turkism was a British product. Richard Moore, a former British ambassador to Turkey and a close friend of Erdogan, is behind the Karabakh war.

Britain has always been on the side of the Ottomans and for the expulsion of Iran from the Caucasus. Today all opponents of Iran have gathered in Karabakh.

Disproof

Conspiracy theory about the war in Nagorno-Karabakh.

There is no evidence that any Western foreign special services had anything to do with the 2020 military escalation between Armenia and Azerbaijan.