DISINFO: Navalny is a common criminal, not political prisoner
DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS
  • Outlet: tass.ru ( archived) *
  • Date of publication: October 19, 2021
  • Article language(s): Russian
  • Countries / regions discussed: Russia

DISINFO: Navalny is a common criminal, not political prisoner

SUMMARY

We are not going to put anyone in any exclusive conditions, including those who hide behind political activities. Navalny is in prison not for his political activities, but for criminal offences, including against foreign entrepreneurs in Russia.

RESPONSE

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation aimed at discrediting Aleksei Navalny.

The European Court of Human Rights, in the judgement Navalnyy v Russia issued on 17 October 2017, ruled that the conviction of Aleksei Navalnyy for commercial fraud was based on an unforeseeable application of criminal law. The court ruled that a violation of Article 7 (no punishment without law) of the European Convention on Human Rights and a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) had taken place.

The case concerned the complaint by Aleksey Navalnyy, a Russian opposition leader, and his brother Oleg Navalnyy, an entrepreneur, that their criminal conviction for fraud and money laundering was based on an unforeseeable application of criminal law and that the proceedings were arbitrary and unfair.

Background:

The Russian administration refused to register the political party of Navalny several times since 2012 and started several new proceedings against him after imprisoning him in 2021, following his return to Russia after having recovered from being poisoned with nerve agent Novichok, as confirmed by the OPCW.

Read the Declaration by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the deteriorating health of Alexei Navalny here.

Embed

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Your opinion matters!

    Data Protection Information *

      Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

      Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

      Data Protection Information *

      The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.