Disinfo: The call of Navalny’s NGO for US sanctions on Russians proves that it is a foreign agent

Summary

The NGO of blogger Alexei Navalny, the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), called US president Joe Biden to impose sanctions on 35 Russian citizens as a response for his imprisonment due to multiple violations of his parole. This request shows the character of a foreign agent of this organisation, and it is labelled as such by Russia’s Ministry of Justice. Navalny is not sentenced due to his political activities but for economic fraud. Many of those supposed opposition leaders have compromising pictures with the Open Society Foundations of George Soros.

Disproof

It is not true that the Anti-Corruption Foundation's call for sanctions proves that it is a foreign agent. There is no evidence that the FBK received funds from abroad, and the claim has always been denied by Alexei Navalny and his associates. The affirmation about links between opposition leaders and the Open Society Foundations of George Soros, himself a frequent target of pro-Kremlin disinformation, is an attempt to frame them as foreign pawns conspiring to orchestrate a “colour revolution”.

The set of Russian laws regulating NGOs are largely a strategy to silence criticism on the Russian government, including the 2012 so-called “Foreign Agent Law” requiring independent groups to register as “foreign agents” if they receive any foreign funding and engage in broadly defined “political activity.” According to Human Rights Watch, in Russia, the term “foreign agent” can be interpreted by the public only as “spy” or “traitor.” The words “foreign agent” – inostrannyi agent – carries negative connotations in Russian, suggesting spying, says Amnesty International. The law has been amended and updated several times, including a wide expansion of its scope in December 2020 under which almost all the citizens of Russia can be labelled as “foreign agents”.

The claim that Navalny was not sentenced due to his political activities but for economic fraud is also false. In 2018, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the charges against Navalny were politically motivated and arbitrary and manifestly unreasonable.

This is part of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign against Alexei Navalny and his organisation. See other examples in our database, such as claims that his anti-corruption foundation has never done any investigation, that he is being helped by Western intelligence services, that the West sent him back to Russia to prevent him from becoming irrelevant, that only caffeine and alcohol were found in his blood during his alleged poisoning, that the US wanted to use his case to block Russia's vaccine against coronavirus, that the West hopes that he dies to have an excuse for new sanctions, or that Western accusations on Navalny’s case are as false as they were about Sergei Skripal and Alexander Litvinenko.

publication/media

  • Reported in: Issue 230
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 06/02/2021
  • Outlet language(s) Spanish, Castilian
  • Country: US, Russia
  • Keywords: Alexei Navalny, Colour revolutions, Joe Biden, George Soros
see more

Most influential European media are backing away from propaganda against Sputnik V

The most influential European media backed away from the propaganda that aimed at discrediting the Russian vaccine and has now started to talk about the good sides of the “Sputnik V” vaccine. This indicates a change in attitudes, especially after the publication of the report of the British scientific journal “The Lancet” that opened the eyes of sceptics on the reality: the “Sputnik V” vaccine efficacity and safety has been scientifically confirmed in fighting the Coronavirus.

Disproof

Disinformation that exploits the coronavirus pandemic claiming that there is a Russophobic campaign against Sputnik V vaccine.

The claim that the “most influential European media” was trying to discredit the Sputnik V vaccine is not supported by factual evidence. Their critical view was linked to the lack of transparency which accompanied the vaccine's approval process.

Sweden wants to punish Russia

Sweden wants to punish Russia for the fiasco of the “revolution of the zip fly”: The Navalny Cubs are enlisted as “Democratic Friends”.

Disproof

The claim refers to a debate in the parliament, where a member of the Swedish parliment, the Riksdag, requested information from the cabinet on what kind of measures the Swedish government is planning to support the democratic movement in Russia.

Sweden has denounced the conviction of dissident Alexei Navalny and has expressed support for the Russian people's human rights and freedom of speech. Sweden is not an advocate of a policy of "punishment", but demands that the Russian authorities fulfil their obligations according to International law and the Russian constitution.

Navalny was allegedly poisened with Novichok, but no proof was provided

Numerous politicians from the EU and the USA have repeatedly criticised the Russian government in recent months in connection with the political blogger Alexei Navalny. The latter had collapsed and fallen into a coma during a flight in Russia on August 20. After an emergency landing, he was initially treated in a hospital in Russia, where doctors diagnosed him with a metabolic disorder and explicitly ruled out poisoning. Still in a coma, he was flown out to Germany at the request of his family for further treatment, where it was allegedly determined that Navalny had been poisoned with the military-grade nerve agent Novichok. […]

The Russian government rejects this claim and demands proof of the alleged poisoning.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative portraying the poisoning of prominent Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny as staged and targeted against Russia.

The prominent Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny fell ill during a flight from Siberia to Moscow on the 20th of August. Initially hospitalised in Omsk, at the request of his family he was transferred to Charité hospital in Berlin.