Disinfo: Navalny’s organisation is plotting a colour revolution

Summary

Several of Alexei Navalny’s “skeleton” organisations have been plotting a colour revolution sponsored by foreign institutions engaged in destructive activities against Russia.

Disproof

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about Alexei Navalny and Western Russophobia. The claim that the calls made by Navalny’s team to protest are foreign engineered colour revolutions is a baseless accusation.

According to the pro-Kremlin media, protests and civil uprisings are never manifestations of genuine popular discontent and political desires manifested by the population, but are foreign engineered colour revolutions directed and funded by Western intelligence services or other Western actors, to destabilise targeted foreign states and bring about regime change. The belief or conviction, that you can mastermind from abroad and run for long periods of time foreign countries, neglects fundamental dynamics in democratic aspirations among ordinary people. As such, this conviction disrespects and disregards the local population.

Read more about the concept of "colour revolutions" in the pro-Kremlin media here.

Currently in April 2021, there are thousands of demonstrations taking place in many Russian cities in support of Navalny, who has galvanised popular discontent with the long rule of President Vladimir Putin.

Putin's foremost critic was detained the moment he returned to Russia in January 2021 after treatment for nerve agent poisoning in Siberia the previous summer. He was then jailed for violating the terms of a court conviction widely condemned as politically motivated.

In April 2021, 44-year-old Navalny was moved to a prison hospital as his health deteriorated during a hunger strike he has staged as a protest against his treatment in prison.

Read similar cases in our database claiming that Navalny's anticorruption NGO is working for Western security services; or that EU sanctions related to the Navalny case are illegal; or that Amnesty International admits that Navalny is a mere criminal; or that US and EU coordinate colour revolutions to destabilise Russia; or that The West wants to storm the Kremlin; or that the West is orchestrating protests around the world.

Go to search

publication/media

alshbaka.net (Archived)
almasryalyoum.com (Archived)
ar.alshbaka.net (Archived)
masrawyfm.com (Archived)
misry4news.com (Archived)
Misr Alan (Archived)
lomazoma.com (Archived)
news.elnel-news.com (Archived)
akher.news (Archived)
nafeza2world.com (Archived)
arabic.sputniknews.com (Archived)
akher.news (Archived)
eg4news.com (Archived)
elbalad140.com (Archived)
russianeventnews.com (Archived)
lialynews.com (Archived)
wtani.com (Archived)
iraqnews-in.com (Archived)
klivehub.com (Archived)
View more
  • Reported in: Issue 241
  • DATE OF PUBLICATION: 20/04/2021
  • Article language(s) Arabic
  • Countries and/or Regions discussed in the disinformation: Russia, US
  • Keywords: Alexei Navalny, Colour revolutions, West, Conspiracy theory, Protest, Encircling Russia, Anti-Russian
see more

Disinfo: Czech allegations against Russia aim to overshadow failed attempt on Lukashenka's life

The US State Department immediately declared that they are not involved in any plot to make an attempt on [Lukashenka's life]. That is, they are not denying the conspiracy itself but only declared that they are not involved. However, who is going to believe the Americans now? In an absolutely similar manner, they were denying their involvement in the coup attempts in Venezuela and in the attempt on Maduro's life.

The US pretends that nothing has happened and the case of the detained US citizen is planned to be dealt with as normal. However, judging by the events that immediately took place in Czechia, the United States admitted its failure. The thing is that Czechia, all of a sudden, announced that military warehouses on its territory were blown up by Russians back in 2014. This whole story is meant to serve as a cover-up for the failed coup d'etat in Belarus.

Apr 19, 2021
Disproof

An unsubstantiated claim about the explosion of an ammunition depot in Czechia in 2014, attempting to ridicule the revelations about GRU's involvement as an 'American attempt to cover a failed attempt on Lukashenka's life'. The second claim is also not supported by any evidence.

Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš and the temporary Minister of Foreign Affairs Jan Hamáček announced on 17 April that the Czech intelligence services collected evidence demonstrating Russian involvement in the 2014 Vrbětice explosion. More specifically, it implicates Unit 29155, a division of Russia's GRU agency previously linked to "assassination attempts and other subversive actions across Europe." According to Mr Babiš, the first discussions around the GRU’s involvement took place on the 7th of April 2021.

Disinfo: The escalation in Donbas is part of a US destabilisation pattern in post-Soviet states

The US wants to divide the Eurasian alliance by encircling Russia as much as possible. How to do it? By looking for a provocation, activating the Donbass conflict and throwing gasoline on the flames, which may get out of control [...]. The US is decided to put Russia in a disastrous situation throughout the post-Soviet environment: war between Azerbaijan and Armenia, the coup in Kyrgyzstan, the coup in Belarus, the government change and pressure over Moldova, the harassment of Nord Stream 2, the mermaid songs that we are hearing towards Georgia. It is all about encircling and setting up a provocation, while the West only points to the other side as the threat. The US states it clearly in its documents, for example in “Overextending and Unbalancing Russia” of the RAND Corporation.

Apr 19, 2021
Disproof

This is a mix of several recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about encircling Russia, popular protests as the result of Western-led colour revolutions and Russia as the ultimate target of international events. In this case, these narratives aim to blame the West for the recent escalation in Donbas, exempting Russia of any responsibility for its military buildup in the Ukrainian border.

Contrary to the claim, the escalation of tensions is not due to any US or Western provocation. Moscow-backed separatists have been mounting tensions in Donbas over the recent weeks under the pretext that Ukrainian troops are planning an offensive. Four Ukrainian soldiers were killed on 26 March 2021, which is the largest daily death toll for government troops since the fragile truce that took effect July 2020.

Disinfo: The West ignored the murder of a 6-year old child in a Ukrainian bombing in Donbas

These are the values of the West: an attack by Kyiv in Donbas killed a 6-year old child and the West did not comment. Neither the executors of the attack nor their Western backers minded that one of the victims was this child. A statement by the French and German foreign ministers Jean-Yves Le Drian and Heiko Maas didn’t mention this, it only showed their concern by the escalation of the conflict and its support to Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty and denounced Russia for moving troops inside Russian territory.

The death, or rather the murder, of this innocent child is already being investigated by the UN, while the incident has been silenced by the media.

Apr 19, 2021
Disproof

This is a deliberate disinformation narrative about the Ukrainian army and the West, without a factual basis. While it is true that on April 6, the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine confirmed the death of a child “due to blast trauma and shrapnel wounds”, according to research by Russian and Ukrainian journalists who investigated the incident his death was not the result of a bombing by the Ukrainian army but an accident with explosives or old ammunition,.

Pro-Kremlin disinformation outlets such as RT German had initially spread information that a child allegedly died as a result of a Ukrainian drone attack in the NGCA [Non-Government-controlled-area] of Donbas, in the village of Oleksandrivske. The claim about a drone bombing was debunked by military expert Oleksandr Kovalenko, who wrote that an unmanned aircraft could not reach Oleksandrivske because the distance from the village to the government-controlled territory is about 30 kilometres. Then, the narrative in these pro-Kremlin disinformation pieces in Spanish language ignored the alleged presence of a drone and shifted the claim towards a generic “bombing” of unspecified origin.